...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Saudi Heart Association >68. Bilateral internal mammary artery in coronary artery bypass grafting and the risk of sternal wound infection in diabetic patients
【24h】

68. Bilateral internal mammary artery in coronary artery bypass grafting and the risk of sternal wound infection in diabetic patients

机译:68.糖尿病患者冠状动脉搭桥术中的双侧乳内动脉与胸骨伤口感染的风险

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Coronary artery bypass grafting is superior to percutaneous interventions in diabetic patients with multi-vessel coronary disease. The use of bilateral internal mammary arteries may lead to better long-term survival, but the risk of postoperative deep sternal wound infection has limited its use in diabetic patients. However, studies have reported conflicting results. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, World of Science, and the Cochrane library were searched for studies comparing the incidence of deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients undergoing either (LITA) or BITA harvest. We used random effect models to compare risk ratios within groups. Results One randomized controlled trial and 10 observational studies (126,235 diabetic patients: 122,465 LITA, 3770 BITA) met inclusion criteria. Deep sternal wound infection occurred in 3.1% and 1.6% for the BITA and LITA cohorts, respectively. The risk ratio for deep sternal wound infection development was 1.71 (1.37–2.14) for BITA compared with LITA. Patients who underwent skeletonized BITA harvest had a similar risk of deep sternal wound infection compared with LITA (0.9 [0.42–2.09]), although pedicled harvest demonstrated increased risk (1.77 [1.4–2.23]). Early mortality was comparable in the LITA cohort (2.5%) and the BITA cohort (2.3%; p = 0.8). Conclusions The risk of sternal wound infection can be minimized in diabetic patients undergoing CABG by performing ITA harvested in a skeletonized manner with meticulous attention to preserving sternal blood flow. Pedicled harvest is to be discouraged when utilizing both ITA owing to a significant increase in the risk of sternal wound infection.
机译:背景技术在多支冠状动脉疾病的糖尿病患者中,冠状动脉旁路移植术优于经皮介入治疗。使用双侧乳内动脉可能会导致更好的长期生存,但是术后深胸骨伤口感染的风险限制了其在糖尿病患者中的使用。但是,研究报告了相互矛盾的结果。方法检索MEDLINE,EMBASE,科学世界和Cochrane库,以比较在接受(LITA)或BITA采集的糖尿病患者中深胸骨伤口感染发生率的研究。我们使用随机效应模型来比较组内的风险比率。结果一项随机对照试验和10项观察性研究(126,235糖尿病患者:122,465 LITA,3770 BITA)符合纳入标准。 BITA和LITA队列的胸骨深部伤口感染发生率分别为3.1%和1.6%。与LITA相比,BITA胸骨深部伤口感染发展的风险比为1.71(1.37–2.14)。与带蒂的​​人相比,行骨化BITA收获的患者发生胸骨深部伤口感染的风险相似(0.9 [0.42-2.09]),尽管带蒂的收获显示风险增加(1.77 [1.4-2.23])。在LITA队列(2.5%)和BITA队列(2.3%; p = 0.8)中,早期死亡率相当。结论进行CABG的糖尿病患者,通过以骨架化的方式收集ITA,并特别注意保持胸骨血流,可以将胸骨伤口感染的风险降到最低。由于胸骨伤口感染的风险显着增加,因此在使用两种ITA时,建议不要采摘花药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号