首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Siena Academy of Sciences >INTERRUPTER RESISTANCE IN PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: CLINICAL UTILITY IN ASTHMA MANAGEMENT
【24h】

INTERRUPTER RESISTANCE IN PRESCHOOL CHILDREN: CLINICAL UTILITY IN ASTHMA MANAGEMENT

机译:学龄前儿童的耐干扰性:哮喘治疗的临床实用性

获取原文
       

摘要

Asthma is the most common chronic disease affecting children in industrialized countries but it is greatly underdiagnosed in preschool children. In these patients, who are not able to collaborate in the execution of spirometry tests, it is possible to use interrupter resistance (Rint) technique. The aim of our study is to assess Rint utility in asthma management when integrated with clinical evaluation in preschool children. Data from 35 preschool children with recurrent wheezing and/or cough were collected. Case history, physical examination, in vitro and in vivo allergy testing were investigated. According to the presence or absence of symptoms in intercritical period they were divided into two groups, asymptomatic (A) and symptomatic (B). To assess respiratory function we used baseline and post-bronchodilator Rint. In group A (asymptomatic) baseline Rint was normal in 78,9% of children and increased in 21,1%. After bronchodilator (BD) administration there was a significant response in 52,6% of patients. In group B (symptomatic) baseline Rint was normal in 81,3% of children and increased in 18,7%. After bronchodilator administration there was a significant response in 56,3% of patients. Our results confirm that baseline Rint cannot be used to discriminate between healthy and sick children, therefore it is necessary to perform this test after administration of BD. In our patients, a significant response to BD permitted to objectify the discomfort of symptomatic children and to report a state of subclinical bronchial obstruction and/or bad perceptions of the severity of bronchospasm in asymptomatic ones, allowing to confirm previous therapeutic choices in some cases and to suggest different therapeutic strategies in others. Therefore, bronchodilator response measured by Rint should be systematically studied and further assessed in conjunction with clinical outcomes, in order to implement asthma management in children unable to produce reliable spirometry.
机译:哮喘是在工业化国家中影响儿童的最常见的慢性疾病,但在学龄前儿童中诊断不足。在这些无法进行肺活量测定测试合作的患者中,可以使用抗干扰剂(Rint)技术。我们研究的目的是评估Rint与学龄前儿童的临床评估相结合时在哮喘管理中的效用。收集了来自35名反复喘息和/或咳嗽的学龄前儿童的数据。研究了病史,体格检查,体外和体内变态反应测试。根据跨临界期症状的存在与否,将其分为无症状(A)和有症状(B)两组。为了评估呼吸功能,我们使用基线和支气管扩张剂后Rint。 A组(无症状)基线Rint在78,9%的儿童中是正常的,在21,1%的儿童中是增加的。给予支气管扩张剂(BD)后,有52.6%的患者有明显缓解。 B组(有症状)的基线Rint在81.3%的儿童中正常,在18.7%的儿童中增加。服用支气管扩张药后,有56.3%的患者有明显缓解。我们的结果证实基线Rint不能用于区分健康儿童和患病儿童,因此有必要在施用BD后执行此测试。在我们的患者中,对BD的显着反应可以使有症状的儿童感到不适,并报告无症状的支气管痉挛严重程度的亚临床支气管阻塞状态和/或不良认识,从而可以在某些情况下确定先前的治疗选择,并在其他方面提出不同的治疗策略。因此,应对Rint测量的支气管扩张药反应进行系统研究,并结合临床结果进行进一步评估,以对无法产生可靠肺活量测定的儿童实施哮喘控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号