...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the International Aids Society >Performance of self‐reported HIV status in determining true HIV status among older adults in rural South Africa: a validation study
【24h】

Performance of self‐reported HIV status in determining true HIV status among older adults in rural South Africa: a validation study

机译:自我报告的艾滋病毒状况在确定南非农村老年人的真实艾滋病毒状况中的表现:一项验证研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: In South Africa, older adults make up a growing proportion of people living with HIV. HIV programmes are likely to reach older South Africans in home‐based interventions where testing is not always feasible. We evaluate the accuracy of self‐reported HIV status, which may provide useful information for targeting interventions or offer an alternative to biomarker testing. Methods: Data were taken from the Health and Aging in Africa: A Longitudinal Study of an INDEPTH Community in South Africa (HAALSI) baseline survey, which was conducted in rural Mpumalanga province, South Africa. A total of 5059 participants aged ≥40?years were interviewed from 2014 to 2015. Self‐reported HIV status and dried bloodspots for HIV biomarker testing were obtained during at‐home interviews. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for self‐reported status compared to “gold standard” biomarker results. Log‐binomial regression explored associations between demographic characteristics, antiretroviral therapy (ART) status and sensitivity of self‐report. Results: Most participants (93%) consented to biomarker testing. Of those with biomarker results, 50.9% reported knowing their HIV status and accurately reported it. PPV of self‐report was 94.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 92.0–96.0), NPV was 87.2% (95% CI: 86.2–88.2), sensitivity was 51.2% (95% CI: 48.2–54.3) and specificity was 99.0% (95% CI: 98.7–99.4). Participants on ART were more likely to report their HIV‐positive status, and participants reporting false‐negatives were more likely to have older HIV tests. Conclusions: The majority of participants were willing to share their HIV status. False‐negative reports were largely explained by lack of testing, suggesting HIV stigma is retreating in this setting, and that expansion of HIV testing and retesting is still needed in this population. In HIV interventions where testing is not possible, self‐reported status should be considered as a routine first step to establish HIV status.
机译:简介:在南非,艾滋病毒携带者中老年人所占比例越来越高。艾滋病项目很可能会通过家庭干预的方式推广到年龄较大的南非人,在这些家庭中,检测并不总是可行的。我们评估自我报告的HIV状况的准确性,这可能会为针对干预措施提供有用的信息,或为生物标志物检测提供替代方法。方法:数据来自“非洲健康与老龄化:南非INDEPTH社区纵向调查(HAALSI)基线调查”,该调查在南非姆普马兰加省农村进行。从2014年到2015年,总共对5059位年龄≥40岁的参与者进行了采访。在家庭访问中,获得了自我报告的HIV状况和用于检测HIV生物标志物的干血斑。与“金标准”生物标志物结果相比,我们计算了自我报告状态的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。对数二项回归分析探讨了人口统计学特征,抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)状态和自我报告敏感性之间的关联。结果:大多数参与者(93%)同意进行生物标志物测试。在具有生物标志物结果的患者中,有50.9%的人报告知道自己的艾滋病毒状况并准确地报告了这一情况。自我报告的PPV为94.1%(95%置信区间(CI):92.0–96.0),NPV为87.2%(95%CI:86.2-88.2),敏感性为51.2%(95%CI:48.2-54.3)和特异性为99.0%(95%CI:98.7–99.4)。参加抗逆转录病毒疗法的参与者更有可能报告其艾滋病毒阳性状态,报告为假阴性的参与者则更有可能接受较早的艾滋病毒检测。结论:大多数参与者愿意分享他们的艾滋病毒状况。假阴性报告在很大程度上是由于缺乏检测所致,这表明在这种情况下艾滋病毒的耻辱感正在回落,而且该人群仍需要扩大艾滋病毒检测和再检测的范围。在无法进行检测的艾滋病毒干预措施中,应将自我报告的状况视为建立艾滋病毒状况的常规第一步。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号