...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the International Aids Society >Central nervous system penetration-effectiveness rank does not reliably predict neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected individuals
【24h】

Central nervous system penetration-effectiveness rank does not reliably predict neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected individuals

机译:中枢神经系统穿透效果等级不能可靠地预测HIV感染者的神经认知障碍

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

IntroductionCentral nervous system (CNS) penetration-effectiveness (CPE) rank was proposed in 2008 as an estimate of penetration of ARV regimen into the CNS, and validated as predictor of CSF HIV-1 replication. Results on predictive role of CPE on neurocognitive and clinical outcome were conflicting.Materials and MethodsRetrospective, cross-sectional analysis of neurocognitive profile in HIV-infected cART-treated patients. All patients underwent neuropsychological (NP) assessment by standardized battery of 14 tests on 5 different domains. People were classified as having NCI if they scored >1 standard deviation (SD) below the normal mean in at least two tests, or >2 SD below in one test. Linear and logistic regression analyses were fitted using as outcome Npz8 and impairedot impaired respectively.ResultsA total of 660 HIV-infected cART-treated individuals from 2009 to 2014, contributing a total of 1003 tests (mean age 49 (IQR 43–56), male 82%; median current CD4 586/mm3; 18% HCV infected; HIV-RNA <40 cp/mL in 84%). Current ARV regimen was 2NRTIs+1NNRTI 50.3%, 2NRTI+1PI/r in 32.6%, NRTI sparing in 11.1%. Mean CPE of current regimens was 6.6 (95% CI 6.5–6.7). As per test multivariable analysis, higher CPE values were associated to poor NP tasks (Beta=?0,09; 95% CI ?0,14 ?0,03; p=0.002 at multivariable linear regression). The association between higher CPE and increased NCI risk was confirmed at multivariable logistic regression, with a 1.24-fold risk of NCI occurrence for each point increase of CPE of current regimen at the time of NP testing (see Table 1). In a sensitivity analysis performed only on patients at the first NP test, the association between higher CPE and poor NP tasks and enhanced NCI risk was only marginally confirmed (Beta=?0,05; [?0,12–0,02]; p=0,19; OR 1,13 [0,95–1,34]; p=0.17). Older age, longer time from HIV diagnosis, current CD4 count <350 cell/mm3 and lower education level were all associated to an increased risk of NCI. Table 1Multivariable analysis of predictors of neurocognitive impairment by logistic regression model
机译:引言中枢神经系统(CNS)渗透效力(CPE)等级是2008年提出的,用于评估ARV方案对CNS的渗透程度,并被确认为CSF HIV-1复制的预测因子。 CPE对神经认知和临床结局的预测作用的结果相互矛盾。材料和方法对HIV感染的cART治疗的患者的神经认知特征进行回顾性,横断面分析。通过对5个不同领域的14项测试进行标准化测试,所有患者均接受了神经心理学(NP)评估。如果人们在至少两次测试中得分均低于正常均值> 1标准差(SD),或者在一项测试中得分均低于正常均值> 2 SD,则将其归为NCI。线性和逻辑回归分析分别以结果Npz8和受损/未受损进行拟合。结果2009年至2014年,共有660例接受HIV感染的cART治疗个体,共进行了1003项测试(平均年龄49(IQR 43-56)) ,男性为82%;中位数电流为CD4 586 / mm3; HCV感染率为18%; HIV-RNA <40 cp / mL,占84%)。当前的ARV方案为2NRTIs + 1NNRTI 50.3%,2NRTI + 1PI / r占32.6%,NRTI保留率为11.1%。当前方案的平均CPE为6.6(95%CI 6.5-6.7)。根据测试多变量分析,较高的CPE值与不良的NP任务相关(Beta =?0.09; 95%CI = 0.14 = 0.03;多变量线性回归时p = 0.002)。在多变量logistic回归分析中证实了较高的CPE与增加的NCI风险之间的关联,在NP测试时,当前方案中每增加1点CPE发生NCI的风险为1.24倍(见表1)。在仅对首次进行NP测试的患者进行的敏感性分析中,仅略微证实了较高的CPE和不良的NP任务与增加的NCI风险之间的相关性(Beta = 0,05; [0,12-0,02]; p = 0,19; OR 1,13 [0,95–1,34]; p = 0.17)。年龄大,艾滋病毒诊断时间长,目前的CD4计数<350细胞/ mm3和较低的教育水平都与NCI风险增加有关。表1用Logistic回归模型对神经认知障碍预测因子的多变量分析

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号