...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the International Aids Society >Examining the effects of HIV self‐testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
【24h】

Examining the effects of HIV self‐testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

机译:与标准的HIV检测服务相比,检验HIV自我检测的效果:系统的审查和荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: HIV self‐testing (HIVST) is a discreet and convenient way to reach people with HIV who do not know their status, including many who may not otherwise test. To inform World Health Organization (WHO) guidance, we assessed the effect of HIVST on uptake and frequency of testing, as well as identification of HIV‐positive persons, linkage to care, social harm, and risk behaviour. Methods: We systematically searched for studies comparing HIVST to standard HIV testing until 1 June 2016. Meta‐analyses of studies reporting comparable outcomes were conducted using a random‐effects model for relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals. The quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Results: After screening 638 citations, we identified five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HIVST to standard HIV testing services among 4,145 total participants from four countries. All offered free oral‐fluid rapid tests for HIVST and were among men. Meta‐analysis of three RCTs showed HIVST doubled uptake of testing among men (RR?=?2.12; 95% CI: 1.51, 2.98). Meta‐analysis of two RCTs among men who have sex with men showed frequency of testing nearly doubled (Rate ratio?=?1.88; 95% CI: 1.17; 3.01), resulting in two more tests in a 12–15‐month period (Mean difference?=?2.13; 95% CI: 1.59, 2.66). Meta‐analysis of two RCTs showed HIVST also doubled the likelihood of an HIV‐positive diagnosis (RR?=?2.02; 95% CI: 0.37, 10.76, 5.32). Across all RCTs, there was no indication of harm attributable to HIVST and potential increases in risk‐taking behaviour appeared to be minimal. Conclusions: HIVST is associated with increased uptake and frequency of testing in RCTs. Such increases, particularly among those at risk who may not otherwise test, will likely identify more HIV‐positive individuals as compared to standard testing services alone. However, further research on how to support linkage to confirmatory testing, prevention, treatment and care services is needed. WHO now recommends HIVST as an additional HIV testing approach.
机译:简介:艾滋病毒自我测试(HIVST)是一种谨慎而便捷的方式,可以帮助那些不知道其状况的艾滋病毒感染者,包括许多可能没有进行其他检查的人。为了向世界卫生组织(WHO)指南提供信息,我们评估了HIVST对检测的吸收和频率以及对HIV阳性人员的识别,与护理的联系,社会危害和风险行为的影响。方法:我们系统地搜索了将HIVST与标准HIV测试进行比较的研究,直到2016年6月1日。使用相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间的随机效应模型对报告可比较结果的研究进行荟萃分析。使用GRADE评估证据的质量。结果:在筛选了638次引用后,我们确定了五个随机对照试验(RCT),将来自四个国家的4,145名参与者中的HIVST与标准HIV检测服务进行了比较。所有这些都为男性提供免费的口服液体快速检测HIVST的方法。对三项RCT的荟萃分析显示,HIVST在男性中的检测率翻了一番(RR?=?2.12; 95%CI:1.51、2.98)。对与男性发生性关系的男性中的两个RCT进行的荟萃分析显示,测试频率几乎翻了一番(比率=?1.88; 95%CI:1.17; 3.01),从而在12-15个月内又进行了两次测试(平均差= 2.13; 95%CI:1.59,2.66)。两项RCT的荟萃分析显示,HIVST也使HIV阳性诊断的可能性增加了一倍(RR?=?2.02; 95%CI:0.37、10.76、5.32)。在所有RCT中,没有迹象表明归因于HIVST的危害,冒险行为的潜在增加似乎很小。结论:HIVST与RCTs的摄取和检测频率增加有关。与单独的标准检测服务相比,这种增加,特别是在那些可能无法进行其他检测的高危人群中,可能会发现更多的HIV阳性个体。但是,需要进一步研究如何支持与验证性检验,预防,治疗和护理服务的联系。世卫组织现在建议将HIVST作为另一种HIV检测方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号