首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association: Association des Bibliotheques de la Sante du Canada. Journal >The Differing Revolutionary Positions of Gramsci and Trotsky in Relation to Classical Marxism, the Peasantry, and the Majority World
【24h】

The Differing Revolutionary Positions of Gramsci and Trotsky in Relation to Classical Marxism, the Peasantry, and the Majority World

机译:葛兰西和托洛茨基在古典马克思主义,农民和多数世界中的不同革命立场

获取原文
       

摘要

While differing arguments are found within the discipline, the principal denominator uniting theories of Marxist revolution is that organized class-based struggle can consequentially result in a more equitable society, one which surpasses a capitalist mode of production. Augmenting Marx's work on the growing realities of the competitive capitalist system, Lenin highlighted that as capitalism expands it increasingly becomes a model not of competing capitalist producers but one of centralized economic monopolies within global society. With this political economic shift in global capitalism, Gramsci and Trotsky penned differing theoretical responses toward the importance of revolutionary tactics in an age of imperialism. It is in this vein that this article delves into the varied responses of permanent revolution and war of position/manoeuvre, while illustrating which theory most effectively demonstrates the capacity and emancipatory efforts of peoples located in countries outside of the imperial nations (i.e. the majority world).
机译:尽管在该学科中发现了不同的论点,但马克思主义革命的统一理论的主要分母是,有组织的基于阶级的斗争可以相应地导致一种更加公平的社会,它超越了资本主义的生产方式。列宁在对马克思关于竞争资本主义制度日益增长的现实的工作进行了补充之后,强调指出,随着资本主义的发展,资本主义日益成为竞争的资本主义生产者的一种模式,而不是竞争的资本主义生产者,而是全球社会中集中的经济垄断者之一。随着全球资本主义政治经济的转变,格拉姆西和托洛茨基对帝国主义时代革命战术的重要性提出了不同的理论回应。正是出于这种脉络,本文探讨了永久革命和阵地/策略战争的不同反应,同时说明了哪种理论最有效地证明了帝国主义国家(即多数世界)以外国家人民的能力和解放努力。 )。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号