...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources >Comparison of Two-point and Two-Time Methods for Estimating the Infiltration Parameters in Meandering Furrow Irrigation
【24h】

Comparison of Two-point and Two-Time Methods for Estimating the Infiltration Parameters in Meandering Furrow Irrigation

机译:两点和两次估算弯沟灌溉入渗参数的方法比较

获取原文

摘要

Infiltration is the most important characteristic in the design and management of any surface irrigation system. Since the hydraulic of flow in meandering furrows is different from the standard furrows, the accuracy of infiltration function parameter estimation methods should be examined for the optimal design and management of meandering furrow irrigation. The main objective of this study was to compare Elliot and Walker's two-point and two-time methods for estimating the empirical infiltration function parameters of meandering furrow irrigation using four sets of field data. The estimated infiltration functions, as obtained by the two methods, were validated by performing the unsteady flow simulations and using the Slow-change/slow-flow (SC/SF) model. The results showed that Elliot and Walker prediction of the advance trajectories (with a mean RMSE of 0.68 minutes) was comparable to the two-time method (with an average RMSE of 0.66 min). The Nash Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient for the simulated outflow hydrograph by the two-time and two-point methods was 0.89 and 0.50, respectively, indicating the excellent predictive power of the two-times method. In addition, the two-time method predicted the total volume of infiltration with the less relative error (-1.5%), in comparison to the two-point method (-47.2%). Therefore, the use of post-advance data (such as a two-time method) for infiltration function parameters estimation improves the flow simulation in the meandering furrows.
机译:在任何地面灌溉系统的设计和管理中,渗透是最重要的特征。由于mean沟的水力不同于标准fur沟,因此应研究渗透函数参数估计方法的准确性,以优化设计和管理management沟灌溉。这项研究的主要目的是比较Elliot和Walker的两点和两次方法,使用四组现场数据估算曲沟灌溉的经验入渗函数参数。通过执行非恒定流模拟并使用慢变化/慢流(SC / SF)模型,可以验证通过两种方法获得的估计渗透函数。结果表明,Elliot和Walker对前进轨迹的预测(平均RMSE为0.68分钟)与两次方法(平均RMSE为0.66分钟)相当。两点法和两点法模拟出水位图的纳什·苏特克利夫效率系数分别为0.89和0.50,表明该方法具有很好的预测能力。此外,与两点法(-47.2%)相比,两次法预测的总渗透量具有较小的相对误差(-1.5%)。因此,使用后进数据(例如两次方法)进行渗透函数参数估计可改善曲折沟中的水流模拟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号