...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources >EDTA Removal of Heavy Metals from Contaminated Soils Using Column Leaching Experiments (Continuous and Pulse Modes)
【24h】

EDTA Removal of Heavy Metals from Contaminated Soils Using Column Leaching Experiments (Continuous and Pulse Modes)

机译:使用色谱柱浸出实验(连续和脉冲模式)从污染土壤中去除EDTA重金属

获取原文

摘要

Consequences of heavy metal accumulation in soils are of great concern. One way of decontaminating heavy metals from soils is using chelating agents, particularly EDTA. In this research, three contaminated soils (with total concentration of these metals of 10.5, 55.8 and 80.6 mmol kg-1) were collected from the surface layer of the lands surrounding a zinc-lead smelting plant in Zanjan province. The extent of Zn, Pb and Cd release by Na2H2EDTA (100 mmol kg-1 of dry soil) from these soils in column leaching experiments (both continuous and pulse addition methods) assembled into half of saturated hydraulic conductivity was assessed. In preliminary experiments, the leaching was stopped due to a drop in hydraulic conductivity. Therefore, the continuous addition method was performed with calcium nitrate as the background solution and the pulse addition method was conducted using this background solution coupled with pH adjustment to 8. Based on the results, the percentage removal of Cd as well as Pb was relatively the same for the two addition methods while the removal of Zn was 13% on average higher in the continuous addition method than in the pulse addition method. For both methods, the removal efficiencies followed the order of complex stability constants (as PbZnCd) in a limited concentration range of EDTA to complex heavy metals. Furthermore, in contrast to Cd and Pb, a direct linear relationship was found between the percentage removal of Pb and its total amount in the soils. Surprisingly, the Pb concentration was on average only about one-twentieth of the Zn concentration. The breakthrough curves of both methods showed the mobility order of CdZnPb. In general, it seems that the removal pattern of soil heavy metals is dependent not only on the soil type but also on the removal method.
机译:土壤中重金属积累的后果令人十分关注。从土壤中净化重金属的一种方法是使用螯合剂,尤其是EDTA。在这项研究中,从赞詹省锌铅冶炼厂周围土地的表层收集了三种被污染的土壤(这些金属的总浓度分别为10.5、55.8和80.6 mmol kg-1)。在组装为饱和水力传导率一半的柱浸实验(连续和脉冲添加方法)中,评估了Na2H2EDTA(100 mmol kg-1的干燥土壤)从这些土壤中释放的Zn,Pb和Cd的程度。在初步实验中,由于水力传导率下降,浸出停止。因此,以硝酸钙为背景溶液进行连续添加,并使用该背景溶液进行脉冲添加,同时将pH值调节至8。根据结果,Cd和Pb的去除率相对较高。两种添加方法的情况相同,而连续添加方法中的锌去除率比脉冲添加方法平均高13%。对于这两种方法,去除效率都遵循在有限浓度的EDTA中对复杂重金属的复杂稳定性常数(如Pb> Zn> Cd)的顺序。此外,与Cd和Pb相比,土壤中Pb的去除率与其总量之间存在直接的线性关系。令人惊讶的是,Pb浓度平均仅约为Zn浓度的二十分之一。两种方法的穿透曲线均显示出Cd> Zn> Pb的迁移率顺序。通常,似乎土壤重金属的去除方式不仅取决于土壤类型,而且取决于去除方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号