首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sport and Health Science >Modelling home advantage for individual teams in UEFA Champions League football
【24h】

Modelling home advantage for individual teams in UEFA Champions League football

机译:为欧洲冠军联赛的足球个人球队建模主场优势

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Home advantage (HA) is well documented in a wide range of team sports including association football (soccer). Although much attention has been paid to differences in the overall magnitude of HA between football competitions and across time, few studies have investigated HA at the team level. Methods A novel method of estimating HA for individual teams, based solely on home performance, was used to compare HA between the highest performing teams and countries in the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) Champions League over a 10-year period (2003/2004 to 2012/2013). Away disadvantage (AD) was also estimated based on each team's performance away from home. Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate covariate adjusted HA and AD in terms of the percentage of goals scored at home (HA) and conceded away from home (AD). Results When controlling for differences in team ability, HA did not vary significantly between the 13 selected teams. There was evidence ( p? 0.1), however, of between-team variation in AD, ranging from 45% (away advantage) to 68% (away disadvantage). When teams were grouped into the 11 selected countries, both HA and AD varied significantly ( p? 0.02) between countries: HA ranged from 52% for Turkish teams to 70% for English teams, while AD ranged from 52% (France) to 67% (Turkey). Conclusion Differences in style of play and tactical approaches to home and away matches may explain some of the variation in HA and AD between teams from different countries.
机译:背景技术家乡优势(HA)在包括团体足球(足球)在内的各种团队运动中得到了充分的证明。尽管人们已经非常关注足球比赛之间以及跨时间段内HA总体水平的差异,但是很少有研究在团队层面对HA进行调查。方法使用一种仅根据主场表现来估算单个球队的HA的新颖方法,用于比较10年期间(2003/2003年)欧洲足球协会联盟(UEFA)冠军联赛中表现最好的球队与国家/地区之间的HA 2004至2012/2013)。客场劣势(AD)也是根据每支球队在外的表现来估算的。 Poisson回归分析用于根据在家得分(HA)和离家退缩(AD)的目标百分比估算协变量调整后的HA和AD。结果在控制团队能力上的差异时,所选的13个团队之间的HA差异不大。有证据表明(p <0.1),团队之间的AD差异在45%(优势)到68%(劣势)之间。当将团队划分为11个选定的国家时,国家之间的HA和AD均存在显着差异(p?<0.02):HA范围从土耳其团队的52%到英语团队的70%,而AD的范围从52%(法国)到AD。 67%(土耳其)。结论比赛风格和主场比赛与客队比赛战术方法的差异可能解释了不同国家/地区的团队在HA和AD方面的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号