首页> 外文期刊>DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology >Analysing Retraction Notices of Scholarly Journals: A Study
【24h】

Analysing Retraction Notices of Scholarly Journals: A Study

机译:分析学术期刊撤稿通知:一项研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Information and communication technology (ICT) is not an unalloyed advantage when talking about propagation and expansion of scholarly knowledge. The same ICT which acts as an enabler to research in the comfort of one’s study and preferred environment makes the researchers with weak conscience vulnerable to the temptation of research misconduct. Surprisingly, the same technology acts as a sentinel, helping academe nail such transgressions and withdrawing them or taking the contextual corrective recourse. Of late, there has been a substantial increase in the invalidation and withdrawal of research articles based on invalid data and findings. One analysed the retraction notices of 249 annulled articles, indexed in Scopus, during the period, 2000-2017. The study has highlighted that the majority of the retracted notices do not have explicit reasons for revoking the findings of research articles. It has stressed upon the immensely pivotal role of libraries in spreading awareness and sensitising researchers with regard to adherence to norms, ethics and policies of scholarly communication.
机译:在谈论学术知识的传播和扩展时,信息和通信技术(ICT)并不是一个无与伦比的优势。同样的ICT可以在舒适的学习环境和理想的环境中充当研究的推动者,这使得良心薄弱的研究人员容易受到研究不端行为的诱惑。出乎意料的是,同一技术充当哨兵,帮助学术界确定此类犯罪行为并予以撤回,或采取情境纠正措施。最近,基于无效数据和发现的研究文章的无效和撤回已大大增加。一份报告分析了2000年至2017年期间在Scopus检索的249篇废书的撤回通知。该研究强调,大多数撤回的通知书没有明确理由撤销研究论文的发现。它强调了图书馆在遵守规范,道德和学术交流政策方面的传播意识和对研究人员敏感方面的巨大关键作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号