...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of radiation research >Telomere length in Chernobyl accident recovery workers in the late period after the disaster
【24h】

Telomere length in Chernobyl accident recovery workers in the late period after the disaster

机译:灾后后期切尔诺贝利事故恢复工作人员的端粒长度

获取原文
           

摘要

Study participants were randomly selected from the CNPP clean-up workers examined in the Centre of Occupational and Radiological Medicine Inpatient and Outpatient Departments of the Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital (‘the Centre') in Riga. The selection criteria for exposed participants were people: (i) who have survived at least 20 years after participation in clean-up works, (ii) for whom there is documented and proven participation in CNPP clean-up works at any time during the period from 26 April 1986 till the end of 1991, (iii) with known data about current health condition, and (iv) who voluntarily participated and provided signed, informed written consent. Exclusion criteria were: (i) refusal of voluntary participation in the study, and (ii) people with extremely severe somatic pathology preventing them from coming to the Centre. All study participants were males. Most of these men participated in CNPP clean-up works for a period of 1–3 months. The group of CNPP clean-up workers studied was a subset of the 6000 Latvian inhabitants sent by the Soviet Union to Chernobyl to combat the consequences of the disaster. Blood samples were collected from CNPP clean-up workers between 2010 and 2012, i.e. ~23 years (range, 19–26 years) after their work in Chernobyl during the period 1986–1991. Blood samples were obtained from the cubital vein in 3-ml sterile vacutainers coated with EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid). Vacutainers were labelled and immediately transported to the laboratory within 24 h. Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood using a FlexiGene Kit (205) (Qiagen, Dusseldorf, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Acquired DNA quality was tested by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA concentration was measured by NanoDrop Spectrophotometer ND-1000. DNA samples were stored in 10 mM Tris-Cl (tris(hydroxymethyl)amino methane) buffer solution at pH = 8.5 and +4°C temperature until the time of assay. RTL was measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) using the approach described by Cawthon [36]. DNA samples were diluted to a concentration of 10.0 ng/μl prior to performing real-time q-PCR. For reference, a DNA sample from a healthy age-matched male without malignancies in anamnesis and not previously exposed to excessive ionizing radiation (other than natural background radiation and rare small medical X-ray examinations) was selected. A dilution line of concentrations 50.0 ng/μl, 16.8 ng/μl, 5.25 ng/μl and 1.82 ng/μl was made from the reference DNA sample. Reference samples were amplified in each run. The PCR mixture was prepared as follows: 2.5 μl of × 10 Taq polymerase buffer (Takara, Japan), 0.2 μl of 10 mM dNTP mixture (Takara, Japan), 2.25 μl of em1109 primer (10 pM), 2.25 μl of em1110 primer (10 pM), 2.25 μl of em1111 primer (10 pM), 2.25 μl of em1112 (10 pM) primer, 2 μl of 5 nM SYBR Green (Invitrogen, USA), 0.5 U of Taq polymerase (SPEED STAR, Takara, Japan) and 9.3 μl of distilled water. To each well, 2 μl of diluted DNA sample and 23 μl of PCR mixture were added. The specific telomere and single-copy gene primers were supplied by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT), Inc., USA. The primer sequences were as follows: Appropriate statistical methods were employed according to the shape of data distribution. The models were adjusted for age. For achieving precise age-effect evaluation, data were weighted by age before analysis using an integrated weighting approach. For performing detailed analysis, outliers were excluded from calculations. The association of RTL with age was evaluated using Spearman's correlation analysis. For comparing subgroups with each other, independent samples t-tests and Mann–Whitney tests were used, and odds ratios (ORs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The significance level was set at 0.05. All calculations were completed using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics Version 20.
机译:研究参与者是从在里加的保尔·斯特拉丁斯临床大学医院(“中心”)的职业和放射医学中心住院和门诊部门检查的CNPP清洁工人中随机抽取的。暴露参与者的甄选标准为以下人员:(i)参与清理工作后至少生存了20年的人员;(ii)在此期间的任何时间都有记录并证明其参与CNPP清理工作的人员从1986年4月26日至1991年底,(iii)具有有关当前健康状况的已知数据,以及(iv)谁自愿参加并提供了签署的知情书面同意书。排除标准为:(i)拒绝自愿参加研究,以及(ii)身体病理极其严重的人阻止他们进入中心。所有研究参与者均为男性。这些人大多数参加了CNPP的清理工作,时间为1-3个月。所研究的CNPP清洁工人小组是苏联派往切尔诺贝利以抗击灾难后果的6000名拉脱维亚居民的一部分。在2010年至2012年之间,即1986年至1991年期间在切尔诺贝利工作后的〜23年(19-26年)内,从CNPP清洁工人那里采集了血液样本。从肘静脉在3毫升涂有EDTA(乙二胺四乙酸)的无菌真空容器中获得血液样本。给真空容器贴上标签,并在24小时内立即运送到实验室。根据生产商的说明,使用FlexiGene Kit(205)(Qiagen,杜塞尔多夫,德国)从全血中分离基因组DNA。通过1%琼脂糖凝胶电泳测试获得的DNA质量。通过NanoDrop分光光度计ND-1000测量DNA浓度。将DNA样品在pH = 8.5和+ 4°C的温度下存储在10 mM Tris-Cl(三(羟甲基)氨基甲烷)缓冲溶液中,直到测定时为止。使用Cawthon [36]描述的方法,通过实时定量聚合酶链反应(q-PCR)测量RTL。在进行实时q-PCR之前,将DNA样品稀释至10.0 ng /μl的浓度。作为参考,选择了一个健康的,年龄相匹配的男性的DNA样本,该男性样本没有遗忘的恶性肿瘤,并且先前没有暴露于过度的电离辐射(自然本底辐射和罕见的小型医学X射线检查除外)。从参考DNA样品中制备出浓度分别为50.0 ng /μl,16.8 ng /μl,5.25 ng /μl和1.82 ng /μl的稀释线。每次运行中都会扩增参考样品。 PCR混合物的制备如下:2.5μl×10 Taq聚合酶缓冲液(日本Takara),0.2μl10 mM dNTP混合物(Takara,日本),2.25μlem1109引物(10 pM),2.25μlem1110引物(10 pM),2.25μlem1111引物(10 pM),2.25μlem1112(10 pM)引物,2μl5 nM SYBR Green(美国Invitrogen),0.5 U Taq聚合酶(SPEED STAR,Takara,Japan) )和9.3μl蒸馏水。向每个孔中添加2μl稀释的DNA样品和23μlPCR混合物。特定的端粒和单拷贝基因引物由美国Integrated DNA Technologies(IDT),Inc.提供。引物序列如下:根据数据分布的形状采用适当的统计方法。对模型进行了年龄调整。为了实现精确的年龄效应评估,在分析之前使用综合加权方法对数据进行了年龄加权。为了进行详细分析,将异常值排除在计算之外。使用Spearman相关分析评估RTL与年龄的关系。为了将亚组相互比较,使用了独立样本t检验和Mann-Whitney检验,并计算了优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。显着性水平设定为0.05。所有计算均使用Microsoft Excel和IBM SPSS Statistics版本20完成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号