首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Research in Dental Sciences >The comparison of the effectiveness of Rose Extract and Diphenhydramine on Aphthus ulcers in Oral mucosa
【24h】

The comparison of the effectiveness of Rose Extract and Diphenhydramine on Aphthus ulcers in Oral mucosa

机译:玫瑰提取物和苯海拉明对口腔黏膜口腔溃疡的疗效比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aim: Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) has a high prevalence and there is no cure for and all current treatments are symptomatic. One of the drugs prescribed for the symptomatic treatment of these lesions is Diphenhydramine. Its side effects are seen and it is contraindicated in some cases. In this study the effect of soluble plant based oral Rose drop in aphthous ulcers compared with Diphenhydramine.Materials & Methods: This Double blind clinical trial study were performed with a sample of 100 people (in two groups of 50 people) and two groups were matched according to sex, age, education level, location and number of aphthous lesions, duration of lesions, recent trauma into the oral mucosa, smoking, and burning and pain severity before treatment. Randomly, one group treated with diphenhydramine and the other group was treated with plant drops of rose extracts. Patients' pain severity at the second, fourth and seventh days after treatment were compared. Collected data were analyzed using Mann-U-Whitney.Results: The severity of pain and burning in the Rose extract treated group in the second, fourth, and seventh days after treatment was respectively, 6.28 ± 1.24, 4.88 ± 1.42, 3.20 ± 1.55.and for the diphenhydramine group in second , fourth and seventh days after treatment was ? 24/1±42/6 . 67/1±4/3 ? 29/1±04/5 These amounts were not significantly different (P 0.05).Conclusions: It seems use of two drugs oral rose extract and diphenhydramine had the same therapeutic effects on oral aphthous lesions, and according to the more benefits of rose extract and the less side effect, the use of this drug is recommended to improve oral aphthous lesions.
机译:背景与目的:复发性口疮性口炎(RAS)的患病率很高,无法治愈,目前所有的治疗方法都是对症治疗。规定对症治疗的一种药物是苯海拉明。可以看到它的副作用,在某些情况下是禁忌的。与苯海拉明相比,可溶性植物性口服玫瑰花滴剂在口腔溃疡中的作用。材料与方法:这项双盲临床试验研究以100人为样本(两组,每组50人),两组进行了配对。根据性别,年龄,受教育程度,口疮病变的部位和数量,病变的持续时间,近期进入口腔粘膜的创伤,吸烟以及烧伤和疼痛的严重程度进行治疗。随机地,一组用苯海拉明治疗,另一组用玫瑰提取物植物滴剂治疗。比较了患者在治疗后第二,第四和第七天的疼痛严重程度。结果:使用玫瑰提取物治疗组在治疗后第二天,第四天和第七天的疼痛和灼伤严重程度分别为6.28±1.24、4.88±1.42、3.20±1.55。 。苯海拉明组在治疗后第二,第四和第七天为? 24/1±42/6。 67/1±4/3? 29/1±04/5,这些量没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。结论:口服玫瑰提取物和苯海拉明两种药物似乎对口腔口疮的治疗效果相同,并且玫瑰的更多益处提取物且副作用较少,建议使用此药以改善口腔口疮病变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号