...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Medicine >Prophylactic pinning should be considered in patients at risk for slipped capital femoral epiphysis
【24h】

Prophylactic pinning should be considered in patients at risk for slipped capital femoral epiphysis

机译:可能发生股骨骨physi滑脱的患者应考虑预防性固定

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The use of prophylactic contralateral pinning for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains controversial. This study evaluated the outcome of SCFE treatment and examined the use of prophylactic pinning. Methods: The study included 44 patients (33 men, 11 women; 54 hips [right, 31; left, 23]), with mean age of 12.9 (7.3–29) years, who underwent treatment between 1986 and 2017, with follow-up for more than 6 months. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1 had bilateral SCFE at first presentation, group 2 developed contralateral side SCFE during follow-up, and group 3 had unilateral SCFE until final follow-up. Three patients who received prophylactic pinning were excluded. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were performed. Results: Overall, 93% (50/54) of hips underwent positional reduction and in situ fixation and 7.4% (4/54) underwent open reduction. Mean follow-up period was 4.8 (0.5–25) years. Groups 1, 2, and 3 had 7, 3, and 31 cases, respectively. Sex, age, and follow-up period showed no significant differences among the groups. The Rohrer index was significantly higher in group 1, the affected side posterior sloping angle (PSA) was significantly higher in group 3, and the contralateral side PSA and percentage with endocrinopathy were significantly higher in group 2. In multivariate logistic analysis, age, sex, Rohrer index, affected side PSA, and endocrinopathy were significantly correlated with bilateral SCFE. Conclusion: We recommend prophylactic contralateral side pinning in patients with risk factors of obesity, high PSA before slipping, and endocrinopathy. Careful observation until growth plate closure is required in patients without risk factors.
机译:背景:预防性对侧固定用于股骨粗骨capital滑脱(SCFE)的使用仍存在争议。这项研究评估了SCFE治疗的结果,并检查了预防性钉扎的使用。方法:该研究纳入了44例患者(33例男性,11例女性; 54例髋关节[右31例;左23例]),平均年龄为12.9岁(7.3-29岁),他们在1986年至2017年期间接受了治疗,随访如下:长达6个月以上。将患者分为3组:第1组在初次就诊时进行双侧SCFE,第2组在随访中发展为对侧SCFE,第3组在最后随访前进行单侧SCFE。排除了接受预防性钉扎的三名患者。进行了单因素和多元逻辑分析。结果:总体上,对髋关节进行了位置复位和原位固定的比例为93%(50/54),对开放髋关节进行了复位的比例为7.4%(4/54)。平均随访期为4.8(0.5-25)年。第1、2和3组分别有7、3和31个案例。性别,年龄和随访时间在两组之间无显着差异。第1组的Rohrer指数显着较高,第3组的患侧后倾斜角(PSA)显着较高,第2组的对侧PSA和伴有内分泌病的百分比显着较高。在多元逻辑分析中,年龄,性别,Rohrer指数,患侧PSA和内分泌病与双侧SCFE显着相关。结论:我们建议对肥胖的危险因素,滑倒前PSA高和内分泌病的患者进行预防性对侧固定。仔细观察直至无危险因素的患者需要关闭生长板。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号