首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Literature and Science >Bradon Smith, “Speculate, speculation, speculative: What can the Energy Humanities do?”
【24h】

Bradon Smith, “Speculate, speculation, speculative: What can the Energy Humanities do?”

机译:布兰登·史密斯(Bradon Smith),“推测,推测,投机:能源人文科学能做什么?”

获取原文
       

摘要

As Castell, Willis and Waddington noted at the inaugural ScienceHumanitiesinternational colloquium, a number of specialist sub-fields have been negotiating theinteraction with the sciences within the humanities for some time, and it is importantto learn from, rather than replace, these practices. The now established field of theEnvironmental Humanities, “a transdisciplinary matrix” in the words of Ursula Heise(Comparative Literature n.p.), is one such practice: as Stephen Muecke puts it in anessay for Latour’s Reset Modernity!, “what about the ‘environmental humanities’ -maybe this new subfield has some solutions for reconciling the sciences with thehumanities, real-world experimentation with the ‘life of the mind’?” (Recomposingthe Humanities 227). In this essay, I will consider what the EnvironmentalHumanities, and particularly its newer relation the Energy Humanities, can teach usabout the kinds of transdisciplinary matrices advocated by the ScienceHumanities.
机译:正如卡斯特尔(Castell),威利斯(Willis)和沃丁顿(Waddington)在首届科学人类国际研讨会上指出的那样,一段时间以来,许多专业子领域一直在与人文科学之间的相互作用进行谈判,因此,重要的是学习而不是替代这些实践。现在已经建立起来的环境人文科学领域,用厄休拉·海斯(Ursula Heise)(比较文学np)的话来说就是“跨学科矩阵”,就是这样一种实践:正如斯蒂芬·穆克(Stephen Muecke)所说的那样,拉图尔(Latour)的《重置现代性》! “-也许这个新的子领域有一些解决方案,可以使科学与人文科学,现实世界中的“心灵生活”相融合?” (重新构成人文科学227)。在本文中,我将考虑环境人文科学,尤其是与能源人文科学之间的较新关系,可以教给我们有关科学人文科学提倡的跨学科矩阵的知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号