首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology >Reservoir potential of the Haymana Formation submarine-fan sandstones in the Haymana Basin of Turkey
【24h】

Reservoir potential of the Haymana Formation submarine-fan sandstones in the Haymana Basin of Turkey

机译:土耳其Haymana盆地Haymana组海底扇状砂岩的储层潜力

获取原文
           

摘要

Sedimentological and petrographic studies of the Haymana Formation sandstones identify a submarine fan in the Haymana Basin. This study is confined to outcrop samples from the submarine-fan sandstones (the L1, L2, and L3 sections) and focuses on documentation of the petrographic characteristics of and depositional controls on reservoir properties of the Haymana Formation sandstones. Analysis of the lithology, texture, sedimentary structure, and petrography of the outcrop samples allows separation of the Haymana Formation sandstones into three distinct lithofacies, A, B, and C. Lithofacies A sandstones exhibit medium-coarse grain sizes (0.4–0.6?mm), moderate-good sorting, and subrounded grains. Lithofacies B sandstones exhibit fine grain sizes (0.2?mm), moderate sorting, and subrounded-subangular grains. Lithofacies C sandstones exhibit very fine grain sizes (0.112?mm) and nonreservoir facies. The main aim of this study is to document the diagenetic history and reservoir quality of the Haymana Formation sandstones. Lithofacies A has the best permeability, ranging from 80 to 120 mD, which can be related to the large grain size, the presence of cross-bedding, small amount of authigenic clays or cements in the pore throats, and enlarged pore apertures. In contrast, Lithofacies B sandstones contain variable yet small pore and pore-throat sizes, which are affected by abundant pore-filling authigenic clays, small grain sizes, and no dissolution. The permeability of the Lithofacies B sandstone ranges from 16 to 35 mD, which is lower than that of the Lithofacies A sandstone. Additionally, the Lithofacies B sandstones have small median pore-throat sizes (mean?=?1.52?μm) and low porosities (average 4–6%), and the Lithofacies A sandstones have large pore-throat sizes (mean?=?2.06–3?μm) and high porosities (average 20–25%), with most pore throats (50% or more) ranging between 1 and 4?μm. According to these data, the Lithofacies A sandstones show good reservoir characterisation. To date, significant hydrocarbon deposits have not been discovered in the Haymana Formation sandstones, although intensive exploratory work towards this end has been carried out in the Haymana Basin. According to this study, the proximal sandstones of the submarine-fan complex of the Haymana Formation may contain high-potential reservoirs in the Haymana Basin. In the basin, hydrocarbon is sourced from deep zones and may be capped by the proximal part of the Haymana Formation sandstones. According to this study, the Lithofacies B sandstones of the Haymana Formation are not suitable as diagenetic traps for hydrocarbon exploration in the Haymana Basin. However, the Lithofacies A sandstones may be expected to have the highest exploration success.
机译:Haymana组砂岩的沉积学和岩石学研究确定了Haymana盆地中的海底扇。这项研究仅限于海底扇状砂岩(L1,L2和L3剖面)的露头样品,并且重点研究了Haymana地层砂岩的岩石学特征和沉积控制方法的文献记录。通过对露头样品的岩性,质地,沉积结构和岩石学进行分析,可以将Haymana地层砂岩分为三个不同的岩相A,B和C。岩相A砂岩的粒度中等(0.4-0.6?mm) ),中等良好的分选和不完整的谷物。岩相B砂岩显示出细粒度(0.2?mm),适度分选和亚圆角亚颗粒。岩相C砂岩显示出非常细的粒度(0.112?mm)和非储层相。这项研究的主要目的是记录Haymana组砂岩的成岩历史和储层质量。岩相岩A的最佳渗透率在80至120 mD范围内,这可能与较大的晶粒尺寸,交叉层理的存在,孔喉中少量自生粘土或胶结物以及孔孔径增大有关。相反,岩相B砂岩包含可变但较小的孔隙和孔喉尺寸,这受大量充填自生粘土,小粒径且无溶解的影响。岩相B砂岩的渗透率范围为16至35 mD,低于岩相A砂岩的渗透率。另外,岩相B砂岩的孔喉中值尺寸较小(平均值为= 1.52?μm),孔隙率较低(平均为4–6%),而岩相A砂岩的孔喉尺寸较大(平均值为= 2.06)。 –3?μm)和高孔隙率(平均20–25%),大多数孔喉(50%或更多)在1-4?μm之间。根据这些数据,岩相A砂岩表现出良好的储层特征。迄今为止,尽管在Haymana盆地进行了深入的勘探工作,但尚未在Haymana地层砂岩中发现大量烃类​​沉积物。根据这项研究,海玛纳组海底-扇形复合体的近端砂岩可能包含海玛纳盆地中的高潜力储层。在盆地中,碳氢化合物来自深部地区,并可能被海马纳组砂岩的近端封盖。根据这项研究,Haymana组的岩相B砂岩不适合作为Haymana盆地油气勘探的成岩圈闭。但是,可能要用Lithofacies A砂岩才能获得最高的勘探成功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号