...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes >Understanding and measuring symptoms and health status in asthma COPD overlap: content validity of the EXACT and SGRQ
【24h】

Understanding and measuring symptoms and health status in asthma COPD overlap: content validity of the EXACT and SGRQ

机译:了解和衡量哮喘COPD的症状和健康状况重叠:EXACT和SGRQ的内容有效性

获取原文

摘要

Abstract BackgroundAsthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap (ACO) differs from asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in demographics, phenotypic characteristics and outcomes, yet the patient experience of ACO is poorly characterized. We aimed to understand and compare the patient experience of symptoms and domains of impact in ACO relative to COPD, and assess the content validity of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments in ACO.MethodsThis US qualitative, interview study included patients who met American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society spirometric criteria for COPD. Additionally, patients with ACO demonstrated reversibility (forced expiratory volume in 1?s [FEV1] increase ≥?12% and?≥?200?mL) to albuterol/salbutamol and an FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio??0.7. Patients took part in concept elicitation (CE) to explore symptoms and impacts of obstructive lung disease. The Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT), St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and a daily wheeze assessment were cognitively debriefed to assess relevance and comprehensiveness. Interviews were analyzed using Atlas.Ti. Concept saturation was evaluated at the symptom level.ResultsTwenty patients with ACO and 10 patients with COPD were recruited. Patients from both groups indicated that shortness of breath was their most frequent and bothersome symptom. The most frequently reported symptoms in both groups were shortness of breath, cough, wheezing, difficulty breathing, mucus/phlegm, chest tightness, and tiredness, weakness or fatigue. The onset, severity, frequency and duration of symptoms were consistently described across both groups, although a higher proportion of patients with ACO experienced exacerbations versus those with COPD. Impacts on daily living, physical impacts and emotional impacts were commonly described (ACO: 90–100%, COPD: 80–100%). Concept saturation was achieved in both groups. Overall, the EXACT, SGRQ and daily wheeze assessment were well understood and relevant to most patients with ACO or COPD (50–100%) and patients generally found the assessments easy to complete. The PRO instruments adequately captured symptoms described during CE, demonstrating high content validity in ACO and COPD.ConclusionsPatients with ACO and COPD experienced similar symptoms and impacts. The EXACT, SGRQ and assessment of wheeze were well understood and captured concepts relevant to patients with ACO.
机译:摘要背景:哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠(ACO)在人口统计学,表型特征和结局方面与哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)不同,但对ACO的患者体验了解甚少。我们旨在了解和比较患者在ACO中相对于COPD的症状和影响范围的经验,并评估ACO中现有患者报告的结局(PRO)仪器的内容效度。方法该美国定性的访谈研究包括符合条件的患者胸科/欧洲呼吸学会COPD肺功能测定标准。此外,ACO患者表现出可逆性(沙丁胺醇/沙丁胺醇的呼气量在1?s [FEV1]时增加≥?12%和?≥?200?mL)和FEV1 /强迫肺活量比≤<0.7。患者参加概念激发(CE),以探索阻塞性肺疾病的症状和影响。在认知上,我们已对慢性肺病恶化(EXACT),圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)和每日喘息评估进行了评估,以评估其相关性和全面性。使用Atlas.Ti对访谈进行了分析。结果从症状水平评估概念饱和度。结果招募了20例ACO患者和10例COPD患者。两组患者均表示呼吸急促是他们最常见且最讨厌的症状。两组中最常报告的症状是呼吸急促,咳嗽,喘息,呼吸困难,粘液/痰,胸闷以及疲倦,虚弱或疲劳。两组患者的症状的发作,严重程度,频率和持续时间均一致,尽管与COPD患者相比,ACO患者中病情加重的比例更高。通常描述了对日常生活,身体影响和情感影响的影响(ACO:90–100%,COPD:80–100%)。两组均达到概念饱和。总体而言,人们对EXACT,SGRQ和每日喘息评估的了解很广,并且与大多数ACO或COPD患者(50-100%)相关,患者通常认为评估容易完成。 PRO仪器可充分捕获CE期间描述的症状,表明ACO和COPD具有较高的含量有效性。结论ACO和COPD的患者也有类似的症状和影响。 EXACT,SGRQ和喘息评估得到了很好的理解,并捕获了与ACO患者相关的概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号