首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pathology Informatics >Empirical comparison of color normalization methods for epithelial-stromal classification in H and E images
【24h】

Empirical comparison of color normalization methods for epithelial-stromal classification in H and E images

机译:H和E图像上皮-间质分类的颜色归一化方法的经验比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Context&58; Color normalization techniques for histology have not been empirically tested for their utility for computational pathology pipelines. Aims&58; We compared two contemporary techniques for achieving a common intermediate goal - epithelial-stromal classification. Settings and Design&58; Expert-annotated regions of epithelium and stroma were treated as ground truth for comparing classifiers on original and color-normalized images. Materials and Methods&58; Epithelial and stromal regions were annotated on thirty diverse-appearing H and E stained prostate cancer tissue microarray cores. Corresponding sets of thirty images each were generated using the two color normalization techniques. Color metrics were compared for original and color-normalized images. Separate epithelial-stromal classifiers were trained and compared on test images. Main analyses were conducted using a multiresolution segmentation (MRS) approach&59; comparative analyses using two other classification approaches (convolutional neural network &91;CNN&93;, Wndchrm) were also performed. Statistical Analysis&58; For the main MRS method, which relied on classification of super-pixels, the number of variables used was reduced using backward elimination without compromising accuracy, and test - area under the curves (AUCs) were compared for original and normalized images. For CNN and Wndchrm, pixel classification test-AUCs were compared. Results&58; Khan method reduced color saturation while Vahadane reduced hue variance. Super-pixel-level test-AUC for MRS was 0.010-0.025 (95% confidence interval limits ± 0.004) higher for the two normalized image sets compared to the original in the 10-80 variable range. Improvement in pixel classification accuracy was also observed for CNN and Wndchrm for color-normalized images. Conclusions&58; Color normalization can give a small incremental benefit when a super-pixel-based classification method is used with features that perform implicit color normalization while the gain is higher for patch-based classification methods for classifying epithelium versus stroma.
机译:上下文&58;对于组织学的颜色归一化技术在计算病理学流水线中的效用尚未经过经验测试。目标&58;我们比较了实现共同的中间目标的两种当代技术-上皮-间质分类。设置和设计&58;专家注释的上皮和基质区域被视为基本事实,用于比较原始图像和色彩标准化图像上的分类器。材料与方法&58;上皮和基质区域标注在30个不同的H和E染色的前列腺癌组织微阵列核心上。使用两种颜色归一化技术分别生成了三十张图像的对应集合。比较原始和色彩标准化图像的色彩指标。训练了单独的上皮-基质分类器,并在测试图像上进行了比较。主要分析是使用多分辨率细分(MRS)方法进行的[59];还使用其他两种分类方法(卷积神经网络&91; CNN&93;,Wndchrm)进行了比较分析。统计分析&58;对于依赖于超像素分类的主要MRS方法,通过向后消除来减少使用的变量数量而不会影响精度,并比较了原始图像和标准化图像的曲线下测试面积(AUC)。对于CNN和Wndchrm,比较了像素分类测试-AUC。结果&58; Khan方法降低了色彩饱和度,而Vahadane降低了色调差异。与10-80可变范围中的原始图像集相比,两个标准化图像集的MRS超像素级测试-AUC高0.010-0.025(95%置信区间限制±0.004)。对于彩色归一化图像,CNN和Wndchrm的像素分类精度也得到了改善。结论&58;当将基于超像素的分类方法与执行隐式颜色归一化的功能一起使用时,颜色归一化可带来较小的增量收益,而基于补丁的将上皮与基质分类的基于补丁的分类方法的增益更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号