首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physiotherapy >Dynamic splints do not reduce contracture following distal radial fracture: a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Dynamic splints do not reduce contracture following distal radial fracture: a randomised controlled trial

机译:动态夹板不能减少radial骨远端骨折后的挛缩:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Question Do dynamic splints reduce contracture following distal radial fracture? Design Assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Participants Forty outpatients with contracture following distal radial fracture. Intervention The control group received routine care consisting of exercises and advice for 8 weeks. In addition to routine care, during the day the experimental group received a dynamic splint, which stretched the wrist into extension but allowed intermittent movement. Outcome measures The primary outcomes were passive wrist extension and the Patient Rated Hand Wrist Evaluation (PRHWE). The secondary outcomes were active wrist extension, flexion, radial deviation, and ulnar deviation, and the performance and satisfaction items of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). All outcomes were measured at commencement, at the end of 8 weeks of treatment, and at 12 weeks (ie, 1 month follow-up). Results The mean between-group difference for passive wrist extension and PRHWE at 8 weeks were 4 deg (95% CI ?4 to 12) and ?2 points (95% CI ?8 to 4), respectively. The corresponding values at 12 week follow-up were 6 deg (95% CI 1 to 12) and 2 points (95% CI ?5 to 9). There were no sufficiently important between-group differences for any of the secondary outcome measures at 8 or 12 weeks. Conclusion It is unclear whether dynamic splints following distal radial fracture have therapeutic effects on passive wrist extension or PRHWE, but they clearly do not have any therapeutic effects on active wrist extension, flexion, radial or ulnar deviation, or on the performance or satisfaction items of the COPM. The ongoing use of dynamic splints following distal radial fracture is difficult to justify. Trial registration ACTRN12608000309381.
机译:问题动力夹板会减少radial骨远端骨折后的挛缩吗?设计评估者盲目随机对照试验。参与者40例radial骨远端骨折后挛缩的门诊患者。干预对照组接受了包括锻炼和建议在内的常规护理,为期8周。除常规护理外,实验组在一天中还接受了动力夹板,将手腕伸开,但允许间歇性运动。结果指标主要结果是被动腕伸和“患者额定手腕评估”(PRHWE)。次要结果是活动的手腕伸展,屈曲,radial骨偏离和尺骨偏离,以及加拿大职业绩效评估(COPM)的绩效和满意度项目。在开始治疗,治疗8周结束时和12周(即1个月随访)时测量所有结局。结果在第8周,被动手腕伸展和PRHWE的平均组间差异分别为4度(95%CI≥4至12)和2个点(95%CI≥8至4)。随访12周的相应值为6度(95%CI为1至12)和2分(95%CI为5至9)。对于8或12周的任何次要结局指标,组间差异均没有足够重要的意义。结论radial骨远端远端骨折后动态夹板是否对被动腕伸或PRHWE有治疗作用尚不清楚,但对主动腕伸,屈曲,radial骨或尺骨偏斜或对患者的性能或满意度没有明显的治疗作用。 COPM。 distal骨远端骨折后动态夹板的持续使用很难证明是正确的。试用注册ACTRN12608000309381。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号