...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physiotherapy >Early intensive hand rehabilitation is not more effective than usual care plus one-to-one hand therapy in people with sub-acute spinal cord injury (‘Hands On’): a randomised trial
【24h】

Early intensive hand rehabilitation is not more effective than usual care plus one-to-one hand therapy in people with sub-acute spinal cord injury (‘Hands On’): a randomised trial

机译:一项随机试验表明,对于亚急性脊髓损伤的人(“ Hands On”),早期的强化手部康复并不比常规护理加一对一的手部治疗有效。

获取原文
           

摘要

Question What is the effect of adding an intensive task-specific hand-training program involving functional electrical stimulation to a combination of usual care plus three 15-minute sessions per week of one-to-one hand therapy in people with sub-acute tetraplegia? Design A parallel group, randomised, controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated concealed block randomisation procedure to either a control or experimental intervention. Participants Seventy people with C2 to T1 motor complete or incomplete tetraplegia within 6 months of injury. Participants were recruited from seven spinal units in Australia and New Zealand. Intervention Experimental participants received intensive training for one hand. Intensive training consisted of training with an instrumented exercise workstation in conjunction with functional electrical stimulation for 1hour per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Both groups received usual care and 15minutes of one-to-one hand therapy three times per week without functional electrical stimulation. Outcome measures The primary outcome was the modified Action Research Arm Test reflecting arm and hand function, which was assessed at the end of the intervention, that is, 11 weeks after randomisation. Secondary outcomes were measured at 11 and 26 weeks. Results Sixty-six (94%) participants completed the post-intervention assessment and were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis. The mean (SD) modified Action Research Arm Test score for experimental and control participants at the post-intervention assessment was 36.5 points (SD 16.0) and 33.2 points (SD 17.5), respectively, with an adjusted mean between-group difference of 0.9 points (95% CI –4.1 to 5.9). Conclusion Adding an intensive task-specific hand-training program involving functional electrical stimulation to a combination of usual care plus three 15-minute sessions per week of one-to-one hand therapy does not improve hand function in people with sub-acute tetraplegia. Registration Australian and New Zealand Trial Registry ACTRN12609000695202 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01086930. [Harvey LA, Dunlop SA, Churilov L, Galea MP, Spinal Cord Injury Physical Activity (SCIPA) Hands On Trial Collaborators (2017) Early intensive hand rehabilitation is not more effective than usual care plus one-to-one hand therapy in people with sub-acute spinal cord injury (‘Hands On’): a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy 63: 197–204].
机译:问题对于亚急性四肢瘫痪患者,在常规护理加每周3次每周15次的一对一手部治疗相结合的过程中,添加包含功能性电刺激的强化任务特定手部训练计划有什么效果?设计平行分组的随机对照试验。通过计算机生成的隐蔽区组随机化程序将参与者随机分配(1:1)进行对照或实验干预。参与者在受伤后6个月内,有C2至T1运动的70人完全或不完全四肢瘫痪。参与者是从澳大利亚和新西兰的七个脊柱部门招募的。干预实验参与者的一只手接受了强化训练。强化训练包括使用仪器锻炼工作站结合功能性电刺激训练,每天进行1小时,每周5天,共8周。两组均接受常规护理,每周接受三次15分钟的一对一手部治疗,无功能性电刺激。成果措施主要结果是经过修改的反映手臂和手功能的动作研究手臂测试,该测试在干预结束时(即随机分组后11周)进行评估。在11和26周测量次要结局。结果有66名(94%)参与者完成了干预后评估,并纳入了主要的意向性治疗分析。干预后评估时,实验参与者和对照组参与者的平均(SD)修正行动研究臂测验得分分别为36.5点(SD 16.0)和33.2点(SD 17.5),调整后的组间平均差值为0.9点(95%CI –4.1至5.9)。结论将涉及功能性电刺激的强化任务特定手部训练计划添加到常规护理加每周三对15次的一对一手部疗法的组合中,并不能改善亚急性四肢瘫痪患者的手部功能。注册澳大利亚和新西兰试验注册中心ACTRN12609000695202和ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01086930。 [Harvey LA,Dunlop SA,Churilov L,Galea MP,脊髓损伤身体活动(SCIPA)参与试验的合作者(2017)早期强化手部康复并没有比普通护理加一对一的手部疗法有效亚急性脊髓损伤(“动手”):一项随机试验。物理治疗杂志63:197–204]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号