...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physiotherapy >Functional electrical stimulation cycling has no clear effect on urine output, lower limb swelling, and spasticity in people with spinal cord injury: a randomised cross-over trial
【24h】

Functional electrical stimulation cycling has no clear effect on urine output, lower limb swelling, and spasticity in people with spinal cord injury: a randomised cross-over trial

机译:功能性电刺激循环对脊髓损伤患者的尿量,下肢肿胀和痉挛没有明显影响:一项随机交叉试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Question Does functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling increase urine output and decrease lower limb swelling and spasticity in people with recent spinal cord injury? Design Randomised cross-over trial. Participants Fourteen participants with a recent motor complete spinal cord injury were consecutively recruited from two spinal cord injury units in Sydney. Intervention Participants were randomised to an experimental phase followed by a control phase or vice versa, with a 1-week washout period in between. The experimental phase involved FES cycling four times a week for two weeks and the control phase involved standard rehabilitation for two weeks. Assessments by a blinded assessor occurred at the beginning and end of each phase. Allocation was concealed and an intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Outcome measures The primary outcome was urine output (mL/hr) and the secondary outcomes were lower limb circumference, and spasticity using the Ashworth Scale, and the Patient Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM). In addition, participants were asked open-ended questions to explore their perceptions about treatment effectiveness. Results All participants completed the study. The mean between-group difference (95% CI) for urine output was 82 mL/hr (–35 to 199). The mean between-group differences (95% CI) for lower limb swelling, spasticity (Ashworth), and PRISM were –0.1 cm (–1.5 to 1.2), –1.9 points (–4.9 to 1.2) and –5 points (–13 to 2), respectively. All point estimates of treatment effects favoured FES cycling. Participants reported many benefits from FES cycling. Conclusion There were no clear effects of FES cycling on urine output, swelling and spasticity even though all point estimates of treatment effects favoured FES cycling and participants perceived therapeutic effects. Trial registration ACTRN12611000923965.
机译:问题对于最近患有脊髓损伤的人,功能性电刺激(FES)循环是否会增加尿量并减少下肢肿胀和痉挛?设计随机交叉试验。参与者从悉尼的两个脊髓损伤单位连续招募了14名最近运动完全性脊髓损伤的参与者。干预参与者被随机分配到实验阶段,然后是对照阶段,反之亦然,之间有1周的清除期。实验阶段包括FES每周四次骑自行车两次,持续两周,而对照阶段则包括标准康复训练,持续两周。盲目评估者的评估在每个阶段的开始和结束时进行。隐藏分配,并进行意向分析。结果测量主要结果为尿量(mL / hr),次要结果为下肢围度,使用Ashworth量表和患者报告的痉挛测量影响(PRISM)进行痉挛。此外,还向参与者提出了开放性问题,以探讨他们对治疗效果的看法。结果所有参与者均完成了研究。尿量的平均组间差异(95%CI)为82 mL / hr(–35至199)。下肢肿胀,痉挛(Ashworth)和PRISM的平均组间差异(95%CI)为–0.1 cm(–1.5至1.2),– 1.9点(–4.9至1.2)和–5点(–13至2)。治疗效果的所有点估计都支持FES循环。参与者报告了FES骑行带来的许多好处。结论FES循环对尿量,肿胀和痉挛没有明显影响,尽管治疗效果的所有点估计都支持FES循环并且参与者感觉到治疗效果。试用注册ACTRN12611000923965。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号