...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physiotherapy >Physical activity stimulation program for children with cerebral palsy did not improve physical activity: a randomised trial
【24h】

Physical activity stimulation program for children with cerebral palsy did not improve physical activity: a randomised trial

机译:一项针对脑瘫儿童的体育锻炼刺激计划并未改善体育锻炼:一项随机试验

获取原文

摘要

Question: In children with cerebral palsy, does a 6-month physical activity stimulation program improve physical activity, mobility capacity, fitness, fatigue and attitude towards sports more than usual paediatric physiotherapy? Design: Multicentre randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessments and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: Forty-nine walking children (28 males) aged 7–13 years with spastic cerebral palsy and severity of the disability classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System level I–III. Intervention: The intervention group followed a 6-month physical activity stimulation program involving counselling through motivational interviewing, home-based physiotherapy, and 4 months of fitness training. The control group continued their usual paediatric physiotherapy. Outcome measures: Primary outcomes were walking activity (assessed objectively with an activity monitor) and parent-reported physical activity (Activity Questionnaire for Adults and Adolescents). Secondary outcomes were: mobility capacity, consisting of Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66), walking capacity and functional strength, fitness (aerobic and anaerobic capacity, muscle strength), self-reported fatigue, and attitude towards sport (child and parent). Assessments were performed at baseline, 4 months, 6 months and 12 months. Results: There were no significant intervention effects for physical activity or secondary outcomes at any assessment time. Positive trends were found for parent-reported time at moderate-to-vigorous intensity (between-group change ratio=2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.4) and GMFM-66 (mean between-group difference=2.8 points, 95% CI 0.2 to 5.4) at 6 months, but not at 12 months. There was a trend for a small, but clinically irrelevant, improvement in the children's attitudes towards the disadvantages of sports at 6 months, and towards the advantages of sports at 12 months. Conclusions: This physical activity stimulation program, that combined fitness training, counselling and home-based therapy, was not effective in children with cerebral palsy. Further research should examine the potential of each component of the intervention for improving physical activity in this population. Trial registration: NTR2099. [Van Wely L, Balemans ACJ, Becher JG, Dallmeijer AJ (2014) Physical activity stimulation program for children with cerebral palsy did not improve physical activity: a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy 60: 40–49].
机译:问题:对于患有脑瘫的儿童,为期6个月的体育锻炼刺激计划是否比普通的儿科理疗疗法更能改善体育活动,活动能力,健身,疲劳和运动态度?设计:多中心随机对照试验,采用隐蔽分配,盲法评估和意向性治疗分析。参加者:年龄在7-13岁之间的四十九名步行儿童(28名男性)患有痉挛性脑瘫,并且残疾的严重程度被分类为I级至III级总运动功能。干预:干预组遵循了为期6个月的体育锻炼刺激计划,其中包括通过动机访谈,家庭理疗和4个月的体能训练进行咨询。对照组继续常规的儿科理疗。结局指标:主要结局为步行活动(通过活动监视器客观评估)和父母报告的身体活动(成人和青少年活动问卷)。次要结果是:运动能力,包括66大运动功能测量(GMFM-66),步行能力和功能强度,健身(有氧和无氧运动能力,肌肉力量),自我报告的疲劳以及对运动的态度(儿童和青少年)。家长)。在基线,4个月,6个月和12个月时进行评估。结果:在任何评估时间,体育锻炼或次要结局均无明显干预效果。父母报告的时间在中到剧烈强度(组间变化比= 2.2,95%CI 1.1至4.4)和GMFM-66(组间平均差异= 2.8点,95%CI 0.2)中呈阳性趋势至5.4)在6个月,但在12个月没有。在6个月大时,儿童对运动不利因素和12个月时对运动的好处态度有了小幅改善,但在临床上无关紧要。结论:这种体育锻炼刺激方案,将体能训练,咨询和家庭疗法相结合,对脑瘫患儿无效。进一步的研究应检查该干预措施的每个组成部分对于改善该人群身体活动的潜力。试用注册:NTR2099。 [Van Wely L,Balemans ACJ,Becher JG,Dallmeijer AJ(2014)脑瘫儿童的体育锻炼刺激计划并未改善体育锻炼:一项随机试验。物理疗法杂志60:40–49]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号