首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physiotherapy >Critically appraised paper: Preoperative physiotherapy education halved postoperative pulmonary complications in patients after upper abdominal surgery [commentary]
【24h】

Critically appraised paper: Preoperative physiotherapy education halved postoperative pulmonary complications in patients after upper abdominal surgery [commentary]

机译:严格评估的文章:上腹部手术后患者的术前理疗教育使术后肺部并发症减半[注释]

获取原文
           

摘要

The trial results point towards an effective intervention in which a single 30-minute preoperative coaching session from a physiotherapist on breathing exercises can halve the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications after upper abdominal surgery. However, there were several imbalances in the randomised groups that might explain some of the effect. The intervention group: was younger; had lower American Society of Anaesthesiology scores; had fewer respiratory, diabetes and cardiac co-morbidities; had fewer current smokers and had a lower pack-year history. Additionally, the intervention group reportedly had higher preoperative handgrip strength and estimated VO2max. Further, less upper gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary surgeries were performed in the intervention group. Are any of these large enough to create an unbalanced risk profile between intervention and control groups, and therefore cast doubt on the results? Probably not in isolation, but collectively? The investigators undertook adjustments to their results for some baseline variables considered to potentially affect the primary outcome, but it is speculative whether this was sufficient. What is known is that presently, preadmission education by physiotherapists for those undergoing upper abdominal surgery is not usual care in Australian and New Zealand hospitals.1 Therefore, for clinical practice change to occur, results have to pass the ‘water cooler test’. It intuitively seems too good to be true that such a minimal-risk preoperative intervention of ‘shock and awe’ education on risks of postoperative pulmonary complications along with coaching on simple breathing exercises would have the profound impact of halving complications in the upper abdominal surgery cohort. Implementation challenges could occur if decision-makers were not fully convinced by or committed to the results. Anecdotally, physiotherapy preoperative assessment and education of those undergoing ‘at-risk’ surgery, such as cardiac, lung lobectomy and upper abdominal surgery, was prevalent in the later part of the 20th century2 but funding for preoperative education, in the absence of evidence, has long been directed elsewhere. This trial is generating much conversation, but needs replicating across jurisdictions before the water cooler chatter can settle and practice change ensues.Provenance: Invited. Not peer reviewed.
机译:该试验结果指向一种有效​​的干预措施,在该干预措施中,物理治疗师进行的一次30分钟的呼吸锻炼前术前辅导可以使上腹部手术后术后肺部并发症的发生率降低一半。但是,随机分组中存在一些失衡现象,这也许可以解释某些影响。干预组:较年轻;美国麻醉学会评分较低;呼吸,糖尿病和心脏病合并症较少;现在的吸烟者较少,并且有较低的包装年历史。此外,据报道,干预组的术前握力更高,估计的最大摄氧量为VO2max。此外,干预组的上消化道/肝胆外科手术较少。这些因素中的任何一个是否足以在干预组和对照组之间造成不平衡的风险状况,并因此对结果产生怀疑?可能不是孤立地,而是集体地?研究人员对一些可能影响主要结果的基线变量进行了结果调整,但尚不确定是否足够。众所周知,目前,在澳大利亚和新西兰的医院中,物理治疗师对进行上腹部手术的患者进行入院前教育并不是通常的护理。1因此,要改变临床实践,结果必须通过“饮水机测试”。从直觉上看似乎太好了,以至于这种对术前肺部并发症风险进行“震撼和敬畏”的最小风险术前干预以及简单的呼吸练习指导将对上腹部手术队列中的并发症减半产生深远影响。如果决策者不完全相信结果或对结果不坚定,可能会遇到实施方面的挑战。有趣的是,在20世纪后期,对心脏,肺叶切除术和上腹部手术等高危手术患者进行理疗术前评估和教育2十分普遍,但是在缺乏证据的情况下,对术前教育进行了资金支持,长期以来一直指向其他地方。这项试验引起了很多讨论,但是需要在各个辖区之间进行重复,然后水冷却器颤振器才能安定下来并进行变更。出处:受邀。没有同行评审。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号