...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oral Science >Comparison of cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance in reciprocating single-file systems and continuous rotary instrumentation systems
【24h】

Comparison of cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance in reciprocating single-file systems and continuous rotary instrumentation systems

机译:往复式单锉刀系统和连续旋转仪表系统中循环疲劳和抗扭强度的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

As compared with continuous rotary systems, reciprocating motion is believed to increase the fatigue resistance of NiTi instruments. We compared the cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of reciprocating single-file systems and continuous rotary instrumentation systems in simulated root canals. Eighty instruments from the ProTaper Universal, WaveOne, MTwo, and Reciproc systems ( n = 20) were submitted to dynamic bending testing in stainless-steel simulated curved canals. Axial displacement of the simulated canals was performed with half of the instruments ( n = 10), with back-and-forth movements in a range of 1.5 mm. Time until fracture was recorded, and the number of cycles until instrument fracture was calculated. Cyclic fatigue resistance was greater for reciprocating systems than for rotary systems ( P 0.05). Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance were greater for reciprocating systems than for continuous rotary systems, irrespective of axial displacement. (J Oral Sci 56, 269-275, 2014)
机译:与连续旋转系统相比,往复运动被认为可以增加NiTi仪器的抗疲劳性。我们在模拟的根管中比较了往复式单锉刀系统和连续旋转器械系统的循环疲劳和抗扭强度。来自ProTaper Universal,WaveOne,MTwo和Reciproc系统的80台仪器(n = 20)已在不锈钢模拟弯道中进行了动态弯曲测试。用一半的器械(n = 10)进行模拟管的轴向移位,来回移动范围为1.5 mm。记录直至断裂的时间,并计算直至仪器断裂的周期数。往复运动系统的抗循环疲劳性能大于旋转系统(P 0.05)。不管轴向位移如何,往复运动系统的循环疲劳和抗扭强度都比连续旋转系统大。 (J Oral Sci 56,269-275,2014)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号