首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Research >Does plate type influence the clinical outcomes and implant removal in midclavicular fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates? A retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Does plate type influence the clinical outcomes and implant removal in midclavicular fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates? A retrospective cohort study

机译:钢板类型是否会影响使用2.7毫米前下钢板固定的锁骨中部骨折的临床疗效和植入物去除?回顾性队列研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical healing rates, implant failure, implant removal, and the need for surgical revision with regards to plate type in midshaft clavicle fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates utilizing modern plating techniques. Methods This retrospective exploratory cohort review took place at a level I teaching trauma center and a single large private practice office. A total of 155 skeletally mature individuals with 156 midshaft clavicle fractures between March 2002 and March 2012 were included in the final results. Fractures were identified by mechanism of injury and classified based on OTA/AO criteria. All fractures were fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates. Primary outcome measurements included implant failure, malunion, nonunion, and implant removal. Secondary outcome measurements included pain with the visual analog scale and range of motion. Statistically significant testing was set at 0.05, and testing was performed using chi-square, Fisher’s exact, Mann–Whitney U , and Kruskall-Wallis. Results Implant failure occurred more often in reconstruction plates as compared to dynamic compression plates ( p =?0.029). Malunions and nonunions occurred more often in fractures fixed with reconstruction plates as compared to dynamic compression plates, but it was not statistically significant. Implant removal attributed to irritation or implant prominence was observed in 14 patients. Statistically significant levels of pain were seen in patients requiring implant removal ( p =?0.001) but were not associated with the plate type. Conclusions Anteroinferior clavicular fracture fixation with 2.7-mm dynamic compression plates results in excellent healing rates with low removal rates in accordance with the published literature. Given higher rates of failure, 2.7-mm reconstruction plates should be discouraged in comparison to stiffer and more reliable 2.7-mm dynamic compression plates.
机译:背景技术本研究的目的是评估采用现代电镀技术固定的2.7 mm前下钢板固定的中轴锁骨骨折的手术类型,手术愈合率,植入物失败,植入物去除以及是否需要手术翻修。方法这项回顾性探索性队列研究是在一级教学创伤中心和一个大型私人执业办公室进行的。最终结果包括2002年3月至2012年3月之间共155具骨骼成熟的个体和156例中轴锁骨骨折。通过损伤机制鉴定骨折,并根据OTA / AO标准进行分类。所有骨折均用2.7毫米前下钢板固定。主要的结局指标包括种植体失败,畸形愈合,骨不愈合和种植体切除。次要结果测量包括视觉模拟量表和运动范围的疼痛。统计上的显着性检验设置为0.05,并使用卡方检验,Fisher's精确检验,Mann-Whitney U和Kruskall-Wallis进行检验。结果与动态加压钢板相比,重建钢板中植入失败的发生率更高(p =?0.029)。与动态加压钢板相比,在用重建钢板固定的骨折中,骨折愈合和骨不愈合的发生率更高,但无统计学意义。在14例患者中观察到归因于刺激或突出的植入物。在需要移除植入物的患者中,疼痛水平在统计学上具有统计学意义(p = 0.001),但与钢板类型无关。结论根据已发表的文献,使用2.7 mm动态加压钢板固定前下锁骨骨折可获得极佳的愈合率,而去除率却很低。考虑到较高的失败率,与更坚固,更可靠的2.7mm动态压缩板相比,不建议使用2.7mm的重建板。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号