...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Research >Comparison of cement pressurisation in flanged and unflanged acetabular cups
【24h】

Comparison of cement pressurisation in flanged and unflanged acetabular cups

机译:法兰和非法兰髋臼杯中水泥加压的比较

获取原文

摘要

Background This biomechanical study examined difference in cement pressures generated by flanged and unflanged acetabular cups in hip arthroplasty. Method Using a model acetabulum, cement was inserted and pressurised followed by cup insertion and pressurisation. Pressures were recorded using transducers in the acetabulum. We compared Charnley Ogee (flanged), Exeter contemporary (flanged) and Exeter low profile (unflanged) cups using Simplex and CMW1 cements in turn. Results Using Simplex, Charnley Ogee cup generated highest initial peak pressure and overall mean pressure. Exeter unflanged cup generated higher initial and mean pressures compared to Exeter flanged cup. With CMW, there was no significant difference between the pressures generated by the cups. Conclusions Our experiment suggests that flanged cups do not consistently generate significantly higher cement pressures compared to unflanged cups.
机译:背景这项生物力学研究检查了髋关节置换术中带凸缘和无凸缘髋臼杯产生的水泥压力差异。方法使用模型髋臼,将水泥插入并加压,然后插入杯子并加压。使用换能器记录髋臼中的压力。我们依次比较了使用Simplex和CMW1水泥的Charnley Ogee(带法兰),Exeter现代(带法兰)和Exeter低型(无法兰)杯。结果使用Simplex,Charnley Ogee杯产生了最高的初始峰值压力和整体平均压力。与埃克塞特带凸缘的杯相比,埃克塞特无凸缘的杯产生更高的初始压力和平均压力。使用CMW,杯子产生的压力之间没有显着差异。结论我们的实验表明,与无凸缘杯相比,带凸缘杯不能始终产生更高的水泥压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号