...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Palaeogeography >Review of molar tooth structure research
【24h】

Review of molar tooth structure research

机译:磨牙结构研究综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract For more than a century, molar tooth structure (MTS) has been studied. The study developed in three stages. During the first stage (before 1980), researchers described three basic morphologies of MTS, mainly from the Belt Supergroup in North America, and they provided several hypotheses for the origin of MTS. During the second stage (1980–1999), the frequent discoveries of {MTS} on all continents resulted in many detailed descriptions of their shape and in several hypotheses concerning the origin of MTS. Notably, hypotheses of MTS’s origin such as seismic activity and biological activity were developed. Since 2000, research has progressed into a new stage (the third stage). This is due to discoveries of {MTS} in the Meso–Neoproterozoic of China and elsewhere, and the ongoing debate on the seismic or biological origin is replaced by a hypothesis that involves gas expansion and chemically-controlled carbonate precipitation (both of them possibly affected by biological activities). This latter idea has gradually been commonly recognized as the mainstream theory. Despite continued disagreements, researchers now agree that microsparry calcite played a controlling role regarding the development and the global distribution of {MTS} in time and space during the Proterozoic, the morphological diversity, and the impact on the sedimentary environment. The present contribution analyses the three major hypotheses regarding the origin of MTS; it also discusses the shortcomings of the hypotheses regarding a seismic or biologic origin, and it details the modern hypothesis that links formation of cracks to the precipitation of sparry calcite. It is deduced that important questions dealing with the Precambrian can be answered, among other aspects regarding the depositional palaeogeography and stratigraphic correlations.
机译:摘要一个多世纪以来,人们一直在研究臼齿结构(MTS)。该研究分为三个阶段。在第一阶段(1980年前),研究人员描述了MTS的三种基本形态,主要来自北美的Belt Supergroup,并为MTS的起源提供了几种假设。在第二阶段(1980-1999年),{MTS}在各大洲的频繁发现导致对其形状的许多详细描述以及有关MTS起源的若干假设。值得注意的是,人们提出了MTS起源的假设,例如地震活动和生物活动。自2000年以来,研究已进入一个新阶段(第三阶段)。这是由于在中国中细生界和其他地方发现了{MTS},有关地震或生物起源的持续辩论被一个假说所取代,该假说涉及气体膨胀和化学控制的碳酸盐沉淀(两者都可能受到影响)。通过生物活动)。后一种想法逐渐被普遍认为是主流理论。尽管仍然存在分歧,但研究人员现在同意,微原生质方解石在元古代时期{MTS}在时间和空间上的发展和全球分布,形态多样性以及对沉积环境的影响方面起着控制作用。本文稿分析了关于MTS起源的三个主要假设;它还讨论了关于地震或生物起源的假说的缺点,并详细介绍了将假说的形成与斯里普方解石的沉淀联系起来的现代假说。可以推断出与前寒武纪有关的重要问题,除了有关沉积古地理和地层相关性的其他方面外,还可以得到解答。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号