...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis
【24h】

The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis

机译:脊髓刺激对难治性脊柱和四肢疼痛止痛药的影响:随机对照试验和荟萃分析的系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To synthesize the evidence regarding the effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on opioid and pain medication reduction in patients with intractable spine or limb pain. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify RCTs of patients with chronic back and/or limb pain of greater than one year duration. Only comparative studies were included (ie, conventional SCS vs medical therapy, conventional SCS vs high-frequency SCS) and were required to have a minimum follow-up period of 3 months. Random effect meta-an alysis was used to compare the three interventions. Results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We identified five trials enrolling 489 patients. Three of the trials reported the results as a number of patients who were able to reduce or eliminate opioid consumption in the SCS vs medical therapy group. The odds of reducing opioid consumption were significantly increased in the SCS group compared to medical therapy (OR 8.60, CI {1.93–38.30}). Two of the trials reported the results as mean medication dose reduction as measured by the Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) in the SCS group vs medical therapy group. MQS score significantly decreased in the SCS group and not in the medical group (WMD –1.97, 95% CI {–3.67, –0.27}). One trial reported a number of patients in high-frequency SCS who were able to reduce opioids vs number of patients in conventional SCS group who were able to reduce opioids. Thirty-four percent of the patients in the high-frequency group and 26% of the patients in the conventional SCS group were able to reduce opioid consumption; however, there was not a significant difference between groups (OR 1.43, 95% CI {0.74, 2.78}). This trial also quantified the opioid reduction in morphine equivalent dosage (MED). In the high-frequency SCS group, average MED decreased by 24.8 mg vs average MED decrease of 7.3 mg in the conventional SCS group. Again, the difference between groups did not reach statistical significance (–17.50, CI {–66.27, 31.27}). Conclusions: In patients with intractable spine/limb pain, SCS was associated with increased odds of reducing pain medication consumption. However, results should be treated with caution as available data were limited, and clinical significance of these findings requires further study.
机译:目的:为难治性脊柱或四肢疼痛患者的脊髓刺激(SCS)减轻阿片类药物和止痛药物的作用综合证据。方法:进行全面的文献检索,以鉴定持续时间超过一年的慢性腰背和/或肢体疼痛患者的RCT。仅纳入比较研究(即常规SCS与药物治疗,常规SCS与高频SCS),并且要求至少随访3个月。随机效应荟萃分析用于比较这三种干预措施。结果以具有95%置信区间(CI)的优势比(OR)或加权平均差(WMD)表示。结果:我们确定了五项试验,招募了489例患者。其中三项试验报告的结果是,SCS与药物治疗组相比,能够减少或消除阿片类药物消费的许多患者。与药物治疗相比,SCS组降低阿片类药物消耗的几率显着增加(OR 8.60,CI {1.93–38.30})。两项试验报告的结果是,根据SCS组与药物治疗组的药物量化量表(MQS)测得的平均药物剂量减少。在SCS组而不是医疗组,MQS评分显着降低(WMD –1.97,95%CI {–3.67,–0.27})。一项试验报告了高频SCS中能够减少阿片类药物的患者数量与常规SCS组中能够减少阿片类药物的患者数量。高频组中有34%的患者和常规SCS组中有26%的患者能够减少阿片类药物的消费;但是,各组之间没有显着差异(OR 1.43,95%CI {0.74,2.78})。该试验还定量了阿片类药物吗啡当量剂量(MED)的降低。在高频SCS组中,平均MED下降了24.8 mg,而常规SCS组中的平均MED下降了7.3 mg。同样,两组之间的差异未达到统计学显着性(–17.50,CI {–66.27,31.27})。结论:在顽固性脊柱/四肢疼痛患者中,SCS与减少止痛药消耗的几率增加相关。但是,由于可用数据有限,应谨慎对待结果,而这些发现的临床意义需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号