首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Clinical efficacy of calcitonin compared to diclofenac sodium in chronic nonspecific low back pain with type I Modic changes: a retrospective study
【24h】

Clinical efficacy of calcitonin compared to diclofenac sodium in chronic nonspecific low back pain with type I Modic changes: a retrospective study

机译:降钙素与双氯芬酸钠相比在I型慢性非特异性下腰痛中的临床疗效:回顾性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of calcitonin with diclofenac sodium in the treatment of patients with nonspecific low back pain (LBP) and type I Modic changes (MC1). Patients and methods: The study was a retrospective observational study with 109 patients who had nonspecific LBP and MC1 that appeared as bone marrow lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Between October 2013 and March 2016, 62 patients were injected intramuscularly with calcitonin 50 IU once daily and 47 patients were treated with diclofenac 75 mg once per day for 4 weeks for the treatment of LBP associated with MC1 on MRI. Visual analog scale (VAS) (0–10) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (0–100) questionnaires were acquired from clinical records to evaluate LBP perception and degree of disability. Imaging data were also collected before and after treatment. Results: Significant improvements were found in VAS and ODI at posttreatment compared?with baseline in both groups ( P 0.05). Meanwhile, there was a significant difference between -calcitonin group and diclofenac group at both 4 weeks and 3 months of follow-up (4 weeks:?VAS 4.46 ± 1.58 vs 5.08 ± 1.50, ODI 20.32 ± 9.64 vs 24.35 ± 7.95; 3 months: VAS 3.70 ± 1.74 vs 4.51 ± 1.67, ODI 16.67 ± 9.04 vs 21.18 ± 9.56; P 0.05 for all). Moreover, the proportion of patients with a significant change in LBP scales was higher in the calcitonin group (4 weeks: VAS 50.00% vs 23.40%, ODI 54.83% vs 25.53%; 3 months: VAS 58.06% vs 38.29%, ODI 59.67% vs 38.29%; P 0.05 for all). According to MRI, 43.54% patients in the calcitonin group showed improvement compared with 21.27% patients in the diclofenac group ( P 0.05). Conclusion: There was greater short-term efficacy of calcitonin compared with diclofenac in patients with LBP and MC1 on MRI.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是比较降钙素和双氯芬酸钠在治疗非特异性下背痛(LBP)和I型Modic改变(MC1)的患者中的疗效。患者和方法:这项研究是一项回顾性观察性研究,其中包括109例非特异性LBP和MC1,这些患者在磁共振成像(MRI)上表现为骨髓病变。在2013年10月至2016年3月之间,每天对62例患者进行肌内注射降钙素50 IU,每天对47例患者给予75 mg双氯芬酸治疗,持续4周,以进行MRI上与MC1相关的LBP治疗。从临床记录中获得视觉模拟量表(VAS)(0–10)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)(0–100)问卷,以评估LBP感知和残疾程度。在治疗之前和之后还收集成像数据。结果:两组患者治疗后VAS和ODI均较基线水平有显着改善(P <0.05)。同时,降钙素组和双氯芬酸组在随访的4周和3个月中都有显着差异(4周:?VAS 4.46±1.58 vs 5.08±1.50,ODI 20.32±9.64 vs 24.35±7.95; 3个月) :VAS 3.70±1.74 vs 4.51±1.67,ODI 16.67±9.04 vs 21.18±9.56;所有P <0.05)。此外,降钙素组中LBP量表有显着变化的患者比例更高(4周:VAS 50.00%vs 23.40%,ODI 54.83%vs 25.53%; 3个月:VAS 58.06%vs 38.29%,ODI 59.67% vs 38.29%; P均<0.05)。根据MRI,降钙素组43.54%的患者表现出改善,而双氯芬酸组则为21.27%(P <0.05)。结论:在MRI检查中,LBP和MC1患者的降钙素近期疗效优于双氯芬酸。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号