首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Comparing the effect of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) with guided imagery on pain severity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
【24h】

Comparing the effect of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) with guided imagery on pain severity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

机译:比较眼动脱敏和再处理(EMDR)与引导影像对类风湿关节炎患者疼痛严重程度的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: Previous studies reported the reduction of pain following eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and guided imagery; however, the effectiveness of these modalities was not compared. The current study aimed to compare the effects of EMDR and guided imagery on pain severity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Material and methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 75 patients were selected using non-random method, and then allocated into two intervention groups and one control group. Interventions were conducted individually in six consecutive sessions for the intervention groups. The Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale was used for data collection before and after the interventions. Collected data were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics in SPSS. Significance level was considered at P 0.05. Results: The post-intervention mean scores of physiological, affective, sensory-discriminative, and cognitive pain sub-scales for patients in guided imagery group were 16.3±2.2, 13.9±2.2, 30.6±3.4, and 23.2±3, respectively. The post-intervention mean scores of these sub-scales in the EMDR group were 22±1.5, 18.1±1.8, 39.6±2.8, and 29±1.8, respectively. A significant difference was observed in the mean pain score between EMDR and guided imagery groups, and also between each intervention group and the control group ( P =0.001). Conclusion: Guided imagery and EMDR could reduce pain in rheumatoid arthritis, but pain reduction was more following the EMDR than guided imagery.
机译:目的:先前的研究报道了减轻眼动脱敏和再处理(EMDR)和引导成像后疼痛的减轻;但是,没有比较这些方式的有效性。本研究旨在比较EMDR和引导影像对类风湿关节炎患者疼痛严重程度的影响。材料和方法:在该随机对照试验中,采用非随机方法选择了75名患者,然后将其分为两个干预组和一个对照组。在干预组的连续六届会议中分别进行了干预。类风湿关节炎疼痛量表用于干预前后的数据收集。在SPSS中使用描述性和推论统计对收集的数据进行分析。显着性水平认为在P <0.05。结果:引导影像组患者的干预后生理,情感,感觉辨别和认知疼痛子量表的平均分分别为16.3±2.2、13.9±2.2、30.6±3.4和23.2±3。 EMDR组中这些子量表的干预后平均得分分别为22±1.5、18.1±1.8、39.6±2.8和29±1.8。在EMDR与引导影像组之间,以及在每个干预组与对照组之间,在平均疼痛评分上均观察到显着差异(P = 0.001)。结论:引导影像和EMDR可以减轻类风湿性关节炎的疼痛,但是EMDR后的疼痛减轻要比引导影像更多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号