首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oral Microbiology >Modification of phage for increased antibacterial effect towards dental biofilm
【24h】

Modification of phage for increased antibacterial effect towards dental biofilm

机译:修饰噬菌体以增强对牙齿生物膜的抗菌作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction of new genetic engineering techniques has enabled a more precise modification of bacteriophage genomes in basic science and engineering. Pires et al. ( 1 ), in a review paper, discuss advances in genetically engineered phages over the last decade. The present commentary focuses on the aspect of modification of phage for enhanced antibacterial activity in dental biofilms.Biofilms consist of bacteria transferred from a free-swimming (planktonic state) to a multitude of bacterial cells encased in a self-produced polysaccharide matrix of hydrated extracellular polymeric substances ( 2 ). Their structure is complex being filled with pillar-formed mature macrocolonies surrounded by fluid-filled channels ( 3 ). These structured microbial communities are characterized by reduced metabolic activity, particularly in the inner layers. Another important feature is their association with chronic infections such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis, Staphylococcus epidermidis and S. aureus infections, urinary tract infection, periodontal disease, and root canal infection. It is well known that biofilm infections can be difficult to eradicate with antimicrobials. Thus, a 100- to 1,000-fold increase in antimicrobial tolerance to biofilms compared to planktonic cells has been reported ( 4 ). This effect is often related to the biofilm matrix that can limit diffusion of molecules and particles, or to reduced bacterial metabolism ( 3 , 5 , 6 ).After their discovery in the early 20th century, bacteriophages were considered to have a great potential as antibacterial agents. Due to poorly controlled clinical trials and inconsistent results, this potential has still to be realized ( 1 ). The discovery of penicillin in 1928 and the arrival of the antibiotic era also reduced the interest for phage therapy, at least in the West, while its use continued in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union ( 7 ). In recent years, the increase in multidrug-resistant bacteria has renewed the interest for using phages as antimicrobial agents, recently also in the oral cavity ( 8 ). Gene engineering has made it possible to modify these bacterial viruses so that they can precisely control and detect bacteria and serve as new sources of antibacterials ( 1 ). They are also being developed as vehicles for drug delivery and vaccines and for assembly of new materials.To increase the efficiency of phage therapy against biofilms, Lu and Collins ( 9 ) engineered a T7 phage to express the biofilm-degrading enzyme dispersin B (DspB). Interestingly, the dsB gene from Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans was cloned downstream of the T7select415-1 10B capsid gene under the control of the T7? 10 promoter. The phage created was efficient against Escherichia coli TG1 biofilms and reduced biofilm cell counts by ~4.5 orders after treatment for 24 h. This reduction was ~2 orders of magnitude more than that achieved by the wild-type nonenzymatic phage. In future work, this technology might involve other enzymes that could target the heterogeneous extracellular composition of dental biofilms to improve their eradication.Also, the T7 phage has been engineered to encode an enzymatic interference with quorum sensing ( 10 ). This is a bacterial cell–cell communication system involved in biofilm formation ( 11 , 12 ). Here, the engineered phage T7aiiA was created by cloning the acyl-homoserine lactone lactonase (AHL-lactonase) gene aiiA from Bacillus anthracis into the T7select415-1 phage vector ( 9 , 10 ). The quorum-quenching enzyme inactivates acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL), which is a quorum-sensing molecule, by hydrolyzing its lactone bonds ( 13 ). In order to test the effect of quorum-sensing phage T7aiiA on biofilm formation, E. coli and P. aeruginosa were mixed together to form biofilms in the presence of the engineered or wild-type phage for 4 and 8 h ( 10 ). Interestingly, phage T7aiiA reduced the biofilm biomass by 74.9 and 65.9% after 4 and 8 h, respectively. In contrast, the control T7 phage gave only a 23.8 and 31.7% reduction, respectively, in comparison with no phage.Quorum sensing is critical for virulence and biofilm formation for oral pathogens. The ability to interfere with bacterial quorum sensing could provide a sophisticated means for manipulating the composition of pathogenic biofilms and possibly eradicate oral infection.It should be noted that the oral cavity is not a foreign area to phages as many of them have active roles in shaping the ecology of oral bacterial communities acting both as commensals and pathogens exceeding the number of bacteria in human gums (>35:1) (reviewed in ( 14 )). Santiago-Rodriguez et al. ( 15 ), using RNA sequencing, found that reads homologous to siphoviruses that infect the phylum Firmicutes were among the most prevalent transcriptome reads both in periodontal health and disease. However, the expression of some genes from the lytic phage module was significantly higher in subjects wit
机译:新的基因工程技术的引入使得在基础科学和工程学中能够更精确地修饰噬菌体基因组。 Pires等。 (1)在一篇综述文章中,讨论了过去十年来基因工程噬菌体的进展。本评论着眼于修饰噬菌体以增强牙科生物膜的抗菌活性的方面。生物膜由细菌从自由游动(浮游状态)转移到许多细菌细胞中,这些细菌细胞被包裹在水化细胞外多糖基质中聚合物质(2)。它们的结构很复杂,被充满流体的通道(3)包围着的柱状成熟大菌落填充。这些结构化的微生物群落的特征是代谢活性降低,尤其是在内层。另一个重要特征是它们与慢性感染相关,如囊性纤维化中的铜绿假单胞菌感染,表皮葡萄球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌感染,尿路感染,牙周病和根管感染。众所周知,生物膜感染很难用抗菌素根除。因此,据报道,与浮游细胞相比,其对生物膜的抗微生物能力提高了100到1,000倍(4)。这种作用通常与可限制分子和颗粒扩散或减少细菌代谢的生物膜基质有关(3、5、6)。在20世纪初发现噬菌体后,人们认为其具有巨大的抗菌潜力。代理商。由于临床试验控制不力和结果不一致,这种潜力仍有待实现(1)。 1928年青霉素的发现以及抗生素时代的到来也至少在西方减少了对噬菌体疗法的兴趣,而在东欧和前苏联则继续使用它(7)。近年来,耐多药细菌的增加重新引起了人们对使用噬菌体作为抗菌剂的兴趣,最近也在口腔中使用了抗菌剂(8)。基因工程使修饰这些细菌病毒成为可能,从而使它们可以精确地控制和检测细菌,并成为抗菌剂的新来源(1)。它们还被开发为药物和疫苗的运输工具以及新材料的组装。为了提高针对生物膜的噬菌体治疗效率,Lu and Collins(9)设计了一种T7噬菌体来表达降解生物膜的酶B(DspB)。 )。有趣的是,来自放线杆菌属的聚合酶链球菌的dsB基因被克隆在T7select415-1 10B衣壳基因的下游。 10个启动子。处理24小时后,产生的噬菌体可有效抵抗大肠杆菌TG1生物膜,并使生物膜细胞数减少约4.5个数量级。这种减少比野生型非酶噬菌体减少了约2个数量级。在未来的工作中,该技术可能涉及其他酶,这些酶可能针对牙齿生物膜的异质细胞外成分,以改善其根除作用。此外,T7噬菌体还经过工程设计,可以编码对群体感应的酶促干扰(10)。这是一个参与生物膜形成的细菌细胞间通信系统(11,12)。在这里,工程菌噬菌体T7aiiA是通过将炭疽芽孢杆菌的酰基高丝氨酸内酯内酯酶(AHL-内酰胺酶)基因aiiA克隆到T7select415-1噬菌体载体中而创建的(9、10)。群体猝灭酶通过水解其内酯键来使作为群体感应分子的酰基高丝氨酸内酯(AHL)失活(13)。为了测试群体感应噬菌体T7aiiA对生物膜形成的影响,将大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌在工程改造或野生型噬菌体存在下混合4小时和8小时以形成生物膜(10)。有趣的是,噬菌体T7aiiA在4小时和8小时后分别使生物膜生物量减少了74.9%和65.9%。相比之下,对照T7噬菌体分别减少了23.8和31.7%,而没有噬菌体。群体感应对于口腔病原体的毒力和生物膜形成至关重要。干扰细菌群体感应的能力可以为操纵病原性生物膜的组成并可能根除口腔感染提供一种复杂的手段。应注意的是,口腔对噬菌体不是异物,因为它们中的许多在形成过程中都起着积极作用超过人类牙龈中细菌数量(> 35:1)的口腔细菌群落既是共生菌又是病原菌(在(14)中进行了综述)。圣地亚哥-罗德里格斯等。 (15),使用RNA测序,发现与感染门扇叶的siphoviruss同源的读物是牙周健康和疾病中最流行的转录组读物。然而,在机智的受试者中,来自裂解噬菌体模块的一些基因的表达明显更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号