...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Palaeogeography >A successful symposium of “Multi-origin of soft-sediment deformation structures and seismites”
【24h】

A successful symposium of “Multi-origin of soft-sediment deformation structures and seismites”

机译:成功举办“软沉积变形结构和地震岩的多源性”研讨会

获取原文
           

摘要

A great progress has been made in researches of soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDS) and seismites in China. However, the research thought was not open-minded. About the origin of SSDS, it was almost with one viewpoint, i.e. , almost all papers published in journals of China considered the beds with SSDS as seismites. It is not a good phenomenon. In order to change this phenomenon, in early 2016, Feng et?al. wrote a paper “ Researches of soft-sediment deformation structures and seismites in China — A brief review ” as “to cast a brick to attract the jade”, emailed this paper to many geologists in China and other countries, and invited them to write papers for the symposium of “Multi-origin of soft-sediment deformation structures and seismites”. “ The seismite problem ” by Prof. G. Shanmugam is the first paper that we have received.The symposium was successfully held in September 24, 2016?at Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan Province, China. The products of this symposium are as follows: (1) The terms “SSDS” and “Multi-origin of SSDS” were accepted by numerous geologists. (2) The definition of seismites by Seilacher (1969), i.e. , “fault-graded beds interpreted as seismites”, should be obsoleted, however, the definition by many geologists today, i.e. , “the seismites are the beds with SSDS really induced by earthquakes”, should not be obsoleted and should be retained. (3) The term “seismites” should be strictly restricted to the beds with SSDS that are really induced by earthquakes. (4) The clastic injections are also with multi-origin, and they cannot definitely be the seismites and may not be the exact criteria of in-situ earthquakes. (5) The most important product of this symposium is that the phenomenon of almost one viewpoint of the researches of SSDS and seismites in China has been Changed eventually.
机译:中国的软沉积变形结构(SSDS)和地震岩体研究取得了很大的进展。但是,研究思想并不开放。关于SSDS的起源,几乎只有一种观点,即几乎所有在中国期刊上发表的论文都将SSDS床视为地震岩。这不是一个好现象。为了改变这种现象,2016年初,冯等人。撰写了一篇论文“中国软沉积物变形结构和地震岩的研究—简要回顾”,题为“用砖砌成吸引玉石”,并通过电子邮件将其发送给中国和其他国家的许多地质学家,并邀请他们撰写论文“软沉积物变形结构和地震岩的多源性”研讨会。 G. Shanmugam教授的“地震问题”是我们收到的第一篇论文。研讨会于2016年9月24日成功在中国河南焦作的河南工业大学举行。本次研讨会的产品如下:(1)术语“ SSDS”和“ SSDS的起源”被许多地质学家接受。 (2)应该废除Seilacher(1969)对地震岩的定义,即“将断层渐变床解释为地震岩”,但是,当今许多地质学家的定义,即“地震岩是真正由SSDS诱发的岩床”。地震”,则不应过时,应保留。 (3)“地震”一词应严格限于真正由地震引起的带有SSDS的床。 (4)碎屑注入也具有多源性,它们不能肯定是地震岩,也可能不是原地地震的确切标准。 (5)本次研讨会的最重要成果是,中国对固态和固态地震研究的几乎一种观点的现象最终得到了改变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号