...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pain and symptom management. >Complex Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy With or Without Vodder II Manual Lymph Drainage in More Severe Chronic Postmastectomy Upper Limb Lymphedema: A Randomized Noninferiority Prospective Study
【24h】

Complex Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy With or Without Vodder II Manual Lymph Drainage in More Severe Chronic Postmastectomy Upper Limb Lymphedema: A Randomized Noninferiority Prospective Study

机译:复杂性充血性淋巴治疗有或没有Vodder II人工淋巴引流术在更严重的慢性乳房切除术后上肢淋巴水肿:一项非劣效性前瞻性研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Context: Complex decongestive lymphatic therapy (CDT) has been the method of choice in conservative management of lymphedema. Although effective, it is time consuming and manual lymph drainage (MLD) usually requires skilled therapists. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the reduction in edema volume in more advanced (>=20% limb volume difference) postmastectomy arm lymphedema achieved by compression bandaging (CB) and physical exercises vs. the same management augmented by an additional 30 minutes of MLD (Vodder II method). Methods: Sixty postmastectomy women were randomly assigned to either the CB group or the CDT group. Of those, 51 women (26 within the CB group) completed 26 weeks of therapy (two weeks of the intensive phase and six months of the maintenance phase). Results: A decrease of limb volume (15.6% in the CB group and 13.8% in the CDT group), edema volume (47.2% and 47.4%, respectively), and limb-related volume change (14.7% and 12.5%) during the intensive phase were observed. This improvement remained constant in both groups after six months of maintenance therapy. The health-related quality of life (measured by the Lymphedema Questionnaire) similarly showed improvement in both groups, with a high level of treatment satisfaction. Conclusion: These results indicate that parallel (immediate and delayed) results may be obtained by CDT without the use of Vodder MLD and CB may be an essential part of lymphedema management.
机译:背景:复杂的充血性淋巴治疗(CDT)已成为保守管理淋巴水肿的首选方法。尽管有效,但费时,手动淋巴引流(MLD)通常需要熟练的治疗师。目的:本研究的目的是比较通过加压包扎(CB)和体育锻炼与同等处理量增加30例相比,在更晚期(≥20%肢体容积差异)的乳房切除术后手臂淋巴水肿中水肿减少的情况。 MLD分钟(Vodder II方法)。方法:将60名乳房切除术后妇女随机分为CB组或CDT组。其中,51名妇女(CB组中的26名)完成了26周的治疗(强化期2周,维持期6个月)。结果:在研究期间,肢体体积减少(CB组为15.6%,CDT组为13.8%),水肿体积(分别为47.2%和47.4%)和肢体相关体积变化(14.7%和12.5%)减少。强化阶段。维持治疗六个月后,两组的这种改善均保持不变。与健康相关的生活质量(通过淋巴水肿问卷测量)相似地显示两组都有改善,治疗满意度很高。结论:这些结果表明,无需使用Vodder MLD就能通过CDT获得平行(立即和延迟)结果,而CB可能是淋巴水肿治疗的重要组成部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号