...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering >A Multi-objective Mixed Model Two-sided Assembly Line Sequencing Problem in a Make –To- Order Environment with Customer Order Prioritization
【24h】

A Multi-objective Mixed Model Two-sided Assembly Line Sequencing Problem in a Make –To- Order Environment with Customer Order Prioritization

机译:带有客户订单优先的按单订购环境中的多目标混合模型双面流水线排序问题

获取原文

摘要

Mixed model two-sided assembly lines (MM2SAL) are applied to assemble large product models, which is produced in high-volume. So, the sequence planning of products to reduce cost and increase productivity in this kind of lines is imperative. The presented problem is tackled in two steps. In step 1, a framework is developed to select and prioritize customer orders under the finite capacity of the proposed production system. So, an Analytic Network Process (ANP) procedure is applied to sort customers’ order based on 11 assessment criteria. In step 2, a mathematical model is formulated to determine the best sequence of products to minimize the total utility work cost, total idle cost, tardiness/earliness cost, and total operator error cost. After validation of the presented model using GAMS software, according to the NP-hard nature of this problem, a genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) are used. The performance of these algorithms are evaluated using some different test problems. The results show that the GA algorithm is better than PSO algorithm. Finally, a sign test for the two metaheuristics and GAMS is designed to display the main statistical differences among them. The results of the sign test reveal GAMS is an appropriate software for solving small-sized problems. Also, GA is better than PSO algorithm for large sized problems in terms of objective function and run time.
机译:混合模型双面装配线(MM2SAL)用于装配大批量生产的大型产品模型。因此,在这种生产线中降低产品成本并提高生产率的产品顺序规划势在必行。提出的问题分两个步骤解决。在第1步中,开发了一个框架,以在建议的生产系统的有限容量下选择客户订单并确定其优先级。因此,根据11个评估标准,应用了分析网络流程(ANP)程序对客户的订单进行排序。在步骤2中,建立了数学模型以确定最佳的产品顺序,以最大程度地减少总的公用事业成本,总的闲置成本,拖延/提前成本和总的操作员错误成本。在使用GAMS软件验证了提出的模型之后,根据此问题的NP难性,使用了遗传算法(GA)和粒子群优化(PSO)。使用一些不同的测试问题评估这些算法的性能。结果表明,GA算法优于PSO算法。最后,针对这两种元启发式算法和GAMS进行符号测试,以显示它们之间的主要统计差异。标志测试的结果表明GAMS是解决小型问题的合适软件。此外,就目标函数和运行时间而言,GA在大型问题上优于PSO算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号