首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oncology Practice >Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Patterns of Chemotherapy and Biologic Therapy Use in US Medical Oncology Practice
【24h】

Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Patterns of Chemotherapy and Biologic Therapy Use in US Medical Oncology Practice

机译:转移性结直肠癌的系统疗法:美国医学肿瘤学实践中化学疗法和生物疗法的应用模式

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract The optimal combination and sequencing of new chemotherapies and biologic agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer are yet to be determined. This study examined the extent and pattern of use by line of treatment. Purpose: With the emergence of new chemotherapies and biologic agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the optimal combination and sequencing of these therapies are yet to be determined. This study examined the extent and pattern of chemotherapy and biologic therapy use by line of treatment. Biologic continuation and dose escalation were also examined. Methods: This study used an integrated electronic medical record database of 91 US oncology practices. Records were analyzed for 1,655 adult patients with mCRC who were treated from January 1, 2004 to January 31, 2008 with systemic therapy and could be observed for ≥ 3 months beyond their diagnosis of metastatic disease. Combination and sequence of individual drugs and regimens were examined. Results: For first-line therapy, the most common chemotherapy backbone was infused fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; 40.5% of patients), and the most common treatment regimen was FOLFOX plus bevacizumab (26.2%). For second-line therapy, fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) was the most common chemotherapy backbone (25.7%), and FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab was the most common treatment regimen (18.3%). Across the study period, 68.6%, 22%, and 7% of patients received bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab, respectively. Among 412 patients receiving bevacizumab-containing regimens as first-line therapy who then received second-line therapy, 58% continued receiving bevacizumab, with dose escalation observed in 44%. Conclusion: The most commonly used chemotherapy backbones for mCRC treatment were first-line FOLFOX and second-line FOLFIRI. Bevacizumab was the most frequently administered biologic therapy. Continuation and dose escalation with bevacizumab were frequently observed across lines of therapy.
机译:摘要治疗转移性大肠癌的新化学药物和生物制剂的最佳组合和顺序尚待确定。这项研究按治疗类别检查了使用的程度和方式。目的:随着治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的新化学疗法和生物制剂的出现,这些疗法的最佳组合和顺序尚待确定。这项研究按治疗类别检查了化学疗法和生物疗法的使用范围和模式。还检查了生物延续性和剂量递增。方法:本研究使用了美国91种肿瘤实践的综合电子病历数据库。分析了2004年1月1日至2008年1月31日接受系统治疗的1,655例mCRC成年患者的记录,在诊断为转移性疾病后可观察到≥3个月。检查了各种药物和方案的组合和顺序。结果:对于一线治疗,最常见的化学疗法骨干是输注氟尿嘧啶,亚叶酸和奥沙利铂(FOLFOX; 40.5%的患者),最常见的治疗方案是FOLFOX加贝伐单抗(26.2%)。对于二线治疗,氟尿嘧啶,亚叶酸钙和伊立替康(FOLFIRI)是最常见的化疗主链(25.7%),而FOLFIRI加贝伐单抗是最常见的治疗方案(18.3%)。在整个研究期间,分别有68.6%,22%和7%的患者接受了贝伐单抗,西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗的治疗。在接受含贝伐单抗方案一线治疗并随后接受二线治疗的412例患者中,58%继续接受贝伐单抗治疗,观察到剂量升高的比例为44%。结论:用于mCRC治疗的最常用化学疗法骨架是一线FOLFOX和二线FOLFIRI。贝伐单抗是最常用的生物疗法。在所有治疗方案中,经常观察到贝伐单抗的持续和剂量递增。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号