首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oncology Practice >ReCAP: Impact of the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program on Clinical Trial and Related Activities at a Community Cancer Center in Rural Nebraska
【24h】

ReCAP: Impact of the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program on Clinical Trial and Related Activities at a Community Cancer Center in Rural Nebraska

机译:ReCAP:国家癌症研究所社区癌症中心计划对内布拉斯加州农村社区癌症中心的临床试验和相关活动的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

AbstractQUESTION ASKED:What is the impact of participating in the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program (NCCCP) on the number of clinical trials available, number of patients enrolled in trials, and trial-related services provided to patients at a rural community-based cancer program?SUMMARY ANSWER:Significant increases in the number and percentage of patients enrolled in clinical trials, in the number of available treatment and non-treatment (eg, prevention, biospecimen, cancer control) trials, in clinical trial staffing, and in the number of tissue samples collected and/or stored were observed during the 5-year period of NCCCP. Biospecimen trials helped promote standardization of collection and storage processes in our community cancer program. Employment and utilization of a genetic counselor, smoking cessation counselor, outreach project coordinator, and two nurse navigators enabled delivery of improved cancer care continuum services to our rural patient population.METHODS:SFCTC clinical trial activities data from July 2002 to June 2007, the 5 years before participation in the NCCCP, and from July 2007 to June 2012, the 5 years during the program, were gathered and compared. Data capture included information on the number and percentage of patients on clinical trials, number and type of available clinical trials, percentage of underserved patients in clinical trials, clinical trial staffing, collection and storage of tissue samples, organizational infrastructure, linkage to NCI-designated cancer centers, and availability of new cancer care services. Percentages of patients in clinical trials were calculated as the ratio of the number of patients enrolled onto clinical trials over the number of analytic new patient cases of cancer through our tumor registry per year. Percentages of tissue samples collected and/or stored were similarly measured as the number of biospecimens collected over the number of analytic new patient cases of cancer per year. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square and Wilcoxon tests.BIAS, CONFOUNDING FACTOR(S), DRAWBACKS:Data 5 years prior to and 5 years during NCCCP were prospectively collected. Analysis of data was performed after the completion of NCCCP.REAL-LIFE IMPLICATIONS:Improving access of all adult cancer patients to clinical trials in the communities where they live is crucial to provide the best cancer care. Participation in the NCCCP had a positive impact on our clinical trial and related activities, providing our rural Nebraska population with enhanced access to both clinical trials and cancer care services. Implementing programs and policies that facilitate the delivery of high-quality care in the community setting is feasible and greatly needed. The NCCCP had a positive impact by providing expanded spectrum of clinical trial types and programs to the population of patients in our cancer program service area.Table 1. Clinical Trial–Related Activities 5 Years Before and During NCCCP at SFCTCTable 1. Clinical Trial–Related Activities 5 Years Before and During NCCCP at SFCTCActivity5 Years Before NCCCP, July 2002 to June 20075 Years of NCCCP, July 2007 to June 2012PFirst Year of NCORP, July 2014 to June 2015No. of dedicated clinical trial staffing (FTE)2 (1.2)5 (3.9).0126 (5)Total No. of accruals (range)83 (9-35)640 (51-230)90Overall participation rate in trials, % (range)3.2 (2-7)23 (9-41) .00118Average accrual No. per clinical trial13.215.8.51.61No. of clinical trials by sponsor (range)????Cooperative46 (5-14)130 (14-29)43????Industry3 (1-2)48 (3-15)5????Investigator initiated5 (0-1)33 (2-10)8????Total54 (6-17)211 (19-54)56No. of clinical trials by type (range)????Total treatment40 (4-14)138 (14-36).01546??Average No. per year828NA????Total nontreatment15 (0-10)61 (3-33).00910??Average No. per year312NA???Supportive care010 (0-10)???Prevention03 (0-1)0???Quality of life4 (0-1)8 (1-2)0???Cancer care delivery07 (1-2)2???Biospecimen10 (2-5)33 (3-9)1Annu
机译:摘要问题:参加美国国家癌症研究所社区癌症中心计划(NCCCP)对可用的临床试验数量,参加试验的患者数量以及向农村社区患者提供的试验相关服务有什么影响总结:参加临床试验的患者数量和百分比,可用治疗和非治疗(例如预防,生物标本,癌症控制)试验,临床试验人员配备以及在NCCCP的5年期间观察到了收集和/或存储的组织样本的数量。生物样本试验有助于促进我们社区癌症计划中收集和储存过程的标准化。雇用和利用遗传咨询师,戒烟咨询师,外展项目协调员和两名护士导航员可以为我们的农村患者群体提供改善的癌症护理连续服务。方法:SFCTC临床试验活动数据(2002年7月至2007年6月)5收集并比较了参加NCCCP的前五年,以及从2007年7月到2012年6月这五年的时间。数据采集​​包括以下信息:临床试验中的患者数量和百分比,可用临床试验的数量和类型,临床试验中服务不足的患者百分比,临床试验人员配备,组织样本的收集和存储,组织基础设施,与NCI指定的联系癌症中心,以及新的癌症护理服务的可用性。计算出临床试验中患者的百分比,即每年通过我们的肿瘤登记系统登记的临床患者数与新分析的癌症患者数之比。收集和/或存储的组织样品的百分比以每年收集的生物标本的数量与每年分析的新癌症患者数量的相似方式测量。使用卡方检验和Wilcoxon检验进行统计分析。前瞻性地收集了NAS的前5年和NCCCP的5年的数据。数据分析在NCCCP完成后进行。对生活的影响:改善所有成年癌症患者在其居住社区中进行临床试验的机会,对于提供最佳癌症护理至关重要。参加NCCCP对我们的临床试验和相关活动产生了积极影响,使我们的内布拉斯加农村人口更容易获得临床试验和癌症护理服务。实施计划和政策以促进在社区环境中提供高质量的护理是可行且迫切需要的。 NCCCP通过向我们癌症计划服务区域的患者群体提供更多种类的临床试验类型和计划而产生了积极的影响。表1. SFCTC在NCCCP之前和期间5年的临床试验相关活动表1.与临床试验相关的临床试验相关活动NCCCP之前和期间在SFCTC上开展活动的5年活动2002年7月至NCCCP之前5年,2007年7月至2012年6月NCCCP开展的年份P NCORP的第一年,2014年7月至2015年6月专用临床试验人员配置(FTE)2(1.2)5(3.9).0126(5)应计总数(范围)83(9-35)640(51-230)90总体临床参与率,%(范围)3.2(2-7)23(9-41)<.00118每个临床试验的平均应计数13.215.8.51.61 No.发起人(范围)进行临床试验的数量合作46(5-14)130(14-29)43行业3(1-2)48(3-15)5研究者发起的5(0 -1)33(2-10)8?总计54(6-17)211(19-54)56按类型(范围)划分的临床试验总治疗量40(4-14)138(14-36).01546每年平均数828 NA不治疗总量15(0-10)61(3-33 ).00910 ??年平均数量312NA ???支持护理010(0-10)???预防03(0-1)0 ???生活质量4(0-1)8(1-2)0 ??癌症护理分娩07(1-2)2 ???生物标本10(2-5)33(3-9)1

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号