首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oncology Practice >ReCAP: Social Media Use Among Physicians and Trainees: Results of a National Medical Oncology Physician Survey
【24h】

ReCAP: Social Media Use Among Physicians and Trainees: Results of a National Medical Oncology Physician Survey

机译:ReCAP:医师和受训者之间的社交媒体使用:全国医学肿瘤医师调查的结果

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

AbstractQUESTION ASKED:To what extent, and for what purpose, do oncology physicians and physicians-in-training use Web-based social media?SUMMARY ANSWER:Despite the ability of social media to enhance collaboration and knowledge dissemination among health care providers, this cohort survey study identified an overall low use of social media among oncologists, and significant generational gaps and differences in patterns of use.METHODS:A nine-item survey was designed using a survey-generating Web site (SurveyMonkey) and was distributed securely via weekly e-mail messages to 680 oncology physicians and physicians-in-training from July 2013 through September 2013. All responses were received anonymously. Results were analyzed and are reported using descriptive statistics.RESULTS:Of 680 surveys sent, 207 were completed, for a response rate of 30.4%. Social media were used by 72% of our survey respondents (95% CI, 66% to 78%; Table 1). Results were cross tabulated by age, which revealed a significant difference in social media use by age group, with 89% of trainees, 93% of fellows, and 72% of early-career oncologists reporting social media use, compared with only 39% of mid-career oncologists (P .05). Respondents reported using each social media platform for either personal or professional purposes, but rarely both. When respondents were questioned regarding barriers to social media use and their hesitations around joining a medically related social media site, the majority (59%) answered, “I don't have enough time.”Table 1. Do You Use Social Media?Table 1. Do You Use Social Media?QuestionNo. of Participants (%)Age (years)18 to 24 (n = 9)25 to 34 (n = 69)35 to 44 (n = 64)45 to 54 (n = 36)≥ 55 (n = 27)Do you use social media??Yes8 (89)64 (93)46 (72)14 (39)16 (59)?No1 (11)5 (7)18 (28)22 (61)11 (41)Which social networking sites do you use??ASCO0 (0)3 (4)9 (14)8 (22)8 (30)?Facebook8 (89)62 (90)33 (52)9 (25)7 (26)?Google+2 (22)15 (22)11 (17)6 (17)11 (41)?LinkedIn3 (33)9 (13)23 (36)4 (11)8 (30)?OncEd.com1 (11)6 (9)18 (28)11 (31)7 (26)?Twitter2 (22)25 (36)11 (17)5 (14)3 (11)?WinC/AlinC3 (33)2 (3)13 (20)5 (14)3 (11)?Other1 (11)4 (6)3 (5)3 (8)0 (0)Abbreviations: AlinC, All in Cancer; WinC, Women in Cancer.BIAS, CONFOUNDING FACTOR(S), DRAWBACKS:This study was conducted online, via e-mail. Therefore, respondents may represent a subpopulation of individuals who already prefer using Web-based technologies and may be more inclined to use social media, compared with individuals who do not use e-mail and were, by default, excluded from the study. We assumed, in designing this study, that the proportion of practicing oncology physicians who do not use e-mail is low. Although our sample size is small, it does represent one third of all registered medical oncologists in Canada. Finally, the high percentage of medical oncologist respondents and the concomitantly low fraction of respondents from other specialties may mean these results are more telling of social media habits in the aforementioned demographic rather than other oncology specialties.REAL-LIFE IMPLICATIONS:Our study revealed that oncology physicians and physicians-in-training who participate in Web-based social networking are largely within the younger age cohorts, whereas mid-career oncologists (age 45 to 54 years) are largely absent from the social media scene. Gaps in social networking use between younger physicians and trainees and older generations of physicians may result in critical gaps in communication, collaboration, and mentorship between these demographics. It is hoped that with further research into understanding patterns of use and limitations, medical professionals and trainees may increase their use of social media for networking, education, mentorship, and improved patient care.
机译:摘要问题:肿瘤医师和接受培训的医师在何种程度上使用基于Web的社交媒体?摘要:尽管社交媒体能够增强医疗保健提供者之间的协作和知识传播,但该人群调查研究发现,肿瘤科医生对社交媒体的总体使用率较低,并且存在明显的代际差距和使用方式的差异。方法:使用生成调查的网站(SurveyMonkey)设计了一项九项调查,并通过每周一次的安全分发从2013年7月至2013年9月向680名肿瘤内科医师和接受培训的医师发送电子邮件。所有回复均以匿名方式收到。结果:使用描述性统计数据进行分析并报告结果。结果:在发送的680项调查中,完成207项,答复率为30.4%。 72%的受访者使用社交媒体(95%CI,66%至78%;表1)。结果按年龄进行交叉列表显示,这表明按年龄组分类的社交媒体使用存在显着差异,受训人员中89%的人,93%的研究员和72%的早期职业医师报告了社交媒体的使用,而只有39%职业生涯中的肿瘤学家(P <.05)。受访者表示出于个人或专业目的而使用每个社交媒体平台,但很少两者兼有。当受访者被问及使用社交媒体的障碍以及他们对加入与医学相关的社交媒体网站的犹豫时,大多数(59%)回答:“我没有足够的时间。”表1.您使用社交媒体吗? 1.您是否使用社交媒体?参加人数(%)年龄(年)18至24(n = 9)25至34(n = 69)35至44(n = 64)45至54(n = 36)≥55(n = 27)使用社交媒体-是8(89)64(93)46(72)14(39)16(59)?否1(11)5(7)18(28)22(61)11(41)哪个社交网站您使用ASCO0(0)3(4)9(14)8(22)8(30)吗?Facebook8(89)62(90)33(52)9(25)7(26)?Google + 2 (22)15(22)11(17)6(17)11(41)?LinkedIn3(33)9(13)23(36)4(11)8(30)?OncEd.com1(11)6(9) )18(28)11(31)7(26)?Twitter2(22)25(36)11(17)5(14)3(11)?WinC / AlinC3(33)2(3)13(20)5 (14)3(11)?Other1(11)4(6)3(5)3(8)0(0)缩写:AlinC,全部在癌症中; WinC,《癌症中的妇女》,BIAS,著名因素,缺点:这项研究是通过电子邮件在线进行的。因此,与不使用电子邮件且默认情况下被排除在研究之外的个人相比,受访者可能代表了已经更喜欢使用基于Web的技术并且可能更倾向于使用社交媒体的个人的子群体。在设计本研究时,我们假设不使用电子邮件的肿瘤内科医师比例很低。尽管我们的样本量很小,但确实占加拿大所有注册肿瘤医生的三分之一。最后,医学肿瘤科医生的受访者比例很高,而来自其他专业的受访者所占比例也较低,这可能意味着这些结果更能说明上述人口统计学领域而不是其他肿瘤学领域的社交媒体习惯。真正的意义:我们的研究表明,肿瘤学参加基于Web的社交网络的医生和培训中的医生大多处于年龄较小的人群中,而处于职业中期的肿瘤科医生(年龄在45至54岁之间)则在社交媒体中很少见。年轻的医生和受训者以及老一辈的医生之间在社交网络使用方面的差距可能会导致这些人群之间的沟通,协作和指导之间存在重大差距。希望通过对理解使用方式和限制方式的进一步研究,医学专业人士和受训人员可以增加社交媒体对网络,教育,指导和改善患者护理的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号