首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Nursing Education and Practice >The traditional-faculty supervised teaching model: Nursing faculty and clinical instructors’ perspectives
【24h】

The traditional-faculty supervised teaching model: Nursing faculty and clinical instructors’ perspectives

机译:传统的老师指导教学模式:护理老师和临床讲师的观点

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The clinical instructors (CI) is an integral part of a quality clinical learning experience. CIs assist nursing students to integrate theory into practice. The traditional faculty-supervised model (traditional model) is used in Canadian undergraduate nursing programs for clinical teaching of Year 1 to 3 students, i.e., one CI supervises 6 to 8 (or 10) nursing students. Some researchers have questioned the effectiveness of the model in preparing students for practice and have concluded that in its current form, it might not be “best practice” with respect to student learning and patient safety. Research is needed to evaluate the traditional model of clinical instruction.?Methods: This study explored perceptions and experiences of full-time faculty and CIs who teach and supervise students using the traditional model; and to identify the strengths and challenges of the model with regard to student learning and patient safety. The sample comprised of five faculty and seven CIs. Using an exploratory descriptive approach, qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic content analysis.Results: Although both faculty and CIs described some positive experiences facilitating nursing students’ learning within the traditional model, participants indicated that their experiences depended on the size and complement of the clinical group. Overall, participants perceived more challenges than strengths with the model. Strengths included: (a) peer learning and support, (b) instructors’ familiarity with curriculum and evaluation process, (c) guidance and support for novice students, (d) instructors’ control over students’ learning, and (e) opportunity for clinical experiences in a variety of settings. Challenges included (a) managing large clinical groups, (b) missed learning opportunities, (c) limited time for teaching and supervision, (d) difficulty balancing student learning with patient safety, (e) being seen as visitors on the unit, and (f) lack of role preparation.Conclusions: These findings provide additional evidence to existing knowledge related to clinical education of nursing students. Recommendations for improving the quality of clinical experiences and support for CIs are presented as a means for mitigating some of the challenges of using the traditional model of instruction.
机译:背景:临床指导员(CI)是高质量临床学习经验的组成部分。 CI可以帮助护理专业的学生将理论融入实践。在加拿大的本科护理课程中,传统的教师指导模型(传统模型)用于1至3年级学生的临床教学,即,一个CI指导6至8(或10)名护理学生。一些研究人员质疑该模型在为学生准备练习方面的有效性,并得出结论,以当前形式,就学生学习和患者安全而言,它可能不是“最佳实践”。方法:本研究探讨了使用传统模式教授和监督学生的全职教师和CI的看法和经验。并确定该模型在学生学习和患者安全方面的优势和挑战。样本由五个教职员工和七个配置项组成。结果:尽管教师和CI都描述了一些在传统模式下促进护理学生学习的积极经验,但参与者表示,他们的经验取决于临床组的大小和补集。总体而言,参与者认为模型带来的挑战多于优势。优势包括:(a)同伴学习和支持,(b)老师熟悉课程和评估过程,(c)对新手学生的指导和支持,(d)老师对学生学习的控制,以及(e)机会在各种环境中的临床经验。面临的挑战包括(a)管理大型临床小组,(b)错过的学习机会,(c)有限的教学和督导时间,(d)在学生学习与患者安全之间取得平衡的困难,(e)被视为单位的访客, (f)缺乏角色准备。结论:这些发现为有关护理学生临床教育的现有知识提供了补充证据。提出了有关提高临床经验质量和对CI的支持的建议,作为缓解使用传统教学模型的某些挑战的一种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号