...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurological sciences (Turkish) >Comparison of Nimodipine Administration Routes in Cerebral Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
【24h】

Comparison of Nimodipine Administration Routes in Cerebral Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

机译:蛛网膜下腔出血后脑血管痉挛尼莫地平给药途径的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and purpose: Increasingly numerous studies have indicated that nimodipine can be recommended as an effective and safe agent for the treatment of symptomatic vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, data regarding its delivery route in the treatment of aSAH are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the effects of different administration routes on the functional improvement of patients with aSAH.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients with aSAH. Of these 27 patients, 2 had intraventricular bleeding and 10 had cerebral hematoma. All patients were divided into 3 groups as follows: the topically applied nimodipine group, the systemically applied nimodipine group and the control group. Patients were treated with nimodipine and the neurological status at discharge and at 3 months were recorded. Transcranial doppler sonography (TCD) was used to monitor cerebral vasospasm following surgical clipping. Liver function and intracranial infection were assessed among three groups.Results: The blood flow velocity was significantly increased at days 1, 5 to days 7, 10 and day 14 after surgery in the topically applied nimodipine group. 2 out of 10 (20%) patients had intracranial infection in the topically applied nimodipine group. There were no intracranial infections in the systemically applied nimodipine group and the control group.Conclusion: Different administration routes may affect the functional improvement in patients with aSAH. The combined use of systemically and topically applied nimodipine may be effective for treatment of cerebral vasospasm following surgical clipping of aneurysms.
机译:背景与目的:越来越多的研究表明,尼莫地平可作为治疗动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后症状性血管痉挛的一种有效且安全的药物。但是,有关其在aSAH治疗中的递送途径的数据不一致。这项研究的目的是评估和比较不同给药途径对aSAH患者功能改善的影响。方法:我们回顾性回顾了27例aSAH患者。在这27例患者中,2例发生脑室内出血,10例发生脑血肿。将所有患者分为三组:局部应用尼莫地平组,全身应用尼莫地平组和对照组。患者接受尼莫地平治疗,并记录出院时和3个月时的神经系统状况。经颅多普勒超声检查(TCD)用于监测手术夹闭后的脑血管痉挛。结果:在局部应用尼莫地平组术后第1、5至7、10和14天,血流速度显着增加。在三组中评估了肝功能和颅内感染。在局部应用尼莫地平组中,每10名患者中有2名(20%)发生颅内感染。全身应用尼莫地平组和对照组均无颅内感染。结论:不同的给药途径可能影响aSAH患者的功能改善。全身和局部应用尼莫地平的联合使用可能有效地治疗动脉瘤夹闭术后的脑血管痉挛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号