...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Nippon Medical School >A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study of Combined Therapy with Bevacizumab and Paclitaxel in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer
【24h】

A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study of Combined Therapy with Bevacizumab and Paclitaxel in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

机译:日本转移性乳腺癌患者联合应用贝伐单抗和紫杉醇联合治疗的回顾性队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: Combined therapy with bevacizumab and paclitaxel (BP regimen) as a first-line treatment has proven highly effective with good tolerance for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of the BP regimen for Japanese patients with MBC in real-world clinical settings. Methods: From June 2012 through May 2014, we recruited 94 patients at 10 medical institutions. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. Objective response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0-Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Results: Nighty patients with MBC (mean 58 years, range: 34-80 years) were enrolled, and 60 (66.6%) and 52 (57.7%) had undergone prior chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment and treatment for MBC, respectively. Median TTF was 6.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-8.3 months), and median OS was 15.4 months (95% CI, 12.0-18.9 months). The overall response rate was 67.8% (95% CI: 57.1-77.2%). A total of 28 patients (31.1%) required a dose reduction of paclitaxel. Forty-five, 42, and 3 patients received the initial doses of 90, 80, and 60 mg/m2, respectively. Among patients who received the initial doses of 90 mg/m2, 13 patients (28.9%) unexpectedly required a dose reduction of ≥20 mg/m2. The BP regimen was discontinued for 66 (73.3%) of the 90 patients, 52 (57.7%) of whom experienced "disease progression." Grade 3/4 hematologic AEs developed in 51 patients (56.6%), with leukopenia and neutropenia in 16 patients (17.8%) and 21 patients (23.3%), respectively. Grade 3 nonhematologic AEs developed in 8 patients (8.9%), with the most common nonhematologic AE of peripheral neuropathy in 4 patients (4.4%). No Grade 4 nonhematologic AEs developed. Peripheral neuropathy [56 patients (62.2%) ], nail discoloration [53 patients (58.9%) ], and fatigue [51 patients (56.7%) ] were the most predominant AEs―the known AEs of paclitaxel. Conclusions: The BP regimen was active and well tolerated in the real-world clinical settings. As many as 28.9% of patients who received the initial dose of 90 mg/m2 required a dose reduction of paclitaxel by 20 mg/m2. Therefore, there is a need to find a therapeutic regimen that is less likely to result in dose reductions for patients with MBC who undergo a BP regimen using the initial paclitaxel dose of 90 mg/m2.
机译:目的:贝伐单抗和紫杉醇联合治疗(一线方案)已被证明对转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者具有高度的耐受性和有效性。这项研究的目的是在现实的临床环境中检查BP方案对日本MBC患者的疗效和安全性。方法:2012年6月至2014年5月,我们在10家医疗机构招募了94名患者。主要终点为治疗失败时间(TTF),次要终点为总体生存期(OS)和安全性。根据实体瘤反应评估标准评估客观反应。不良事件(AEs)根据美国国家癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准4.0版-日本临床肿瘤学组进行分级。结果:招募了睡梦中的MBC患者(平均58岁,范围:34-80岁),分别有60例(66.6%)和52例(57.7%)接受过既往化疗作为MBC的辅助治疗。 TTF中位数为6.2个月(95%置信区间[CI]为4.2-8.3个月),中位OS​​为15.4个月(95%CI为12.0-18.9个月)。总体回应率为67.8%(95%CI:57.1-77.2%)。共有28位患者(31.1%)需要减少紫杉醇的剂量。 45例,42例和3例患者分别接受了90、80和60 mg / m 2 的初始剂量。初始剂量为90 mg / m 2 的患者中,有13名患者(28.9%)出乎意料地要求降低剂量≥20 mg / m 2 。 90例患者中有66例(73.3%)停止了BP治疗,其中52例(57.7%)经历了“疾病进展”。 3/4级血液学不良事件发生在51例患者中(56.6%),白细胞减少和中性粒细胞减少症分别发生在16例患者(17.8%)和21例患者(23.3%)中。 8例(8.9%)发生了3级非血液学不良事件,其中4例(4.4%)发生了最常见的周围神经病非血液学不良事件。没有发生4级非血液学不良事件。周围神经病变[56例(62.2%)],指甲变色[53例(58.9%)]和疲劳[51例(56.7%)]是最主要的AE,是紫杉醇的已知AE。结论:在现实世界的临床环境中,BP方案很活跃且耐受性很强。初始剂量为90 mg / m 2 的患者中,多达28.9%的患者需要将紫杉醇的剂量降低20 mg / m 2 。因此,有必要找到一种治疗方案,该方案不太可能导致使用紫杉醇初始剂量90 mg / m 2 的BP方案的MBC患者减少剂量。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号