...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ayub Medical College >COMPARISON OF COMPLETE DENTURE FABRICATED BY TWO DIFFERENT BORDER MOLDING MATERIALS, IN TERMS OF PATIENTS’ SATISFACTION
【24h】

COMPARISON OF COMPLETE DENTURE FABRICATED BY TWO DIFFERENT BORDER MOLDING MATERIALS, IN TERMS OF PATIENTS’ SATISFACTION

机译:根据患者满意度,使用两种不同的边界成型材料制成的全口义齿的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Restoration of dentition leads to an improvement in the oral health related quality of life. Complete dentures are used to restore this oral cavity disability to its original condition. This study was designed to compare satisfaction levels between two groups of edentulous patients for whom two different border moulding techniques: ‘conventional green stick’ and ‘polyvinyl siloxane material’ were employed. Methods: This was a cross-sectional questionnaire based study. A questionnaire was designed in the Department of Prosthodontics at the Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry to compare the satisfaction levels between two groups by assessing the following four variables: ‘retention’, ‘stability’, ‘comfort during final impression procedure’ and ‘time taken by the procedure’. Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups for ‘retention’, ‘stability’ and ‘comfort during the final impression procedure’ ( p 0.05). For ‘stability’ there was a significant difference between the two groups. However, as the difference was only that of one patient (31 patients having ‘good stability’ in Group A, as compared to 32 in Group B); the difference was not considered significant. The conventional border moulding technique took significantly more time as compared to the modified polyvinyl siloxane technique ( p 0.05).The mean satisfaction score was low (7.36±0.45). There was a significant difference in the patient satisfaction scores between the modified and the conventional border moulding techniques ( p 0.05). Conclusion: Although a significant difference was found between the patient satisfaction levels between the two groups, the clinical significance of these results is still in question as the only factor found to be different between the two groups was the ‘time taken’. Keywords: Denture, fabricated, moulding, satisfaction
机译:背景:牙列修复可改善与口腔健康相关的生活质量。使用全口义齿将口腔残疾恢复至其原始状态。这项研究旨在比较两组无牙病患者的满意度,他们对这两种无牙患者使用了两种不同的边界成型技术:“常规生坯”和“聚乙烯基硅氧烷材料”。方法:这是一项基于横断面问卷的研究。武装部队牙科研究所的修复科设计了一个调查表,通过评估以下四个变量来比较两组之间的满意度:“保留”,“稳定性”,“最终印模过程中的舒适度”和“花费的时间”通过程序”。结果:两组之间在“保留”,“稳定性”和“最终印象过程中的舒适度”方面没有发现显着差异(p> 0.05)。出于“稳定性”考虑,两组之间存在显着差异。然而,由于差异仅是一名患者(A组中31例具有“良好稳定性”的患者,而B组中32例);差异不被认为是显着的。与改良的聚乙烯基硅氧烷技术相比,传统的边框成型技术要花费更多的时间(p <0.05)。平均满意度得分较低(7.36±0.45)。改良的和传统的边界成型技术之间的患者满意度得分存在显着差异(p> 0.05)。结论:尽管两组患者的满意度之间存在显着差异,但这些结果的临床意义仍存在疑问,因为两组之间唯一不同的因素是“花费时间”。关键字:假牙,制造,成型,满意

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号