...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical screening >Improving attendance for breast screening among recent non-attenders: a randomised controlled trial of two interventions in primary care
【24h】

Improving attendance for breast screening among recent non-attenders: a randomised controlled trial of two interventions in primary care

机译:近期无病者进行乳腺筛查的机会增加:两项初级保健干预措施的随机对照试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives To examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two primary care based interventions aimed at increasing breast screening uptake for women who had recently failed to attend. Setting 13 General practices with low uptake in the second round of breast screening (below 60%) in north west London and the West Midlands, United Kingdom. Participants were women in these practices who were recent non-attenders for breast screening in the third round. Methods Pragmatic factorial randomised controlled trial, with people randomised to a systematic intervention (general practitioner letter), an opportunistic intervention (flag in women's notes prompting discussion by health professionals), neither intervention, or both. Outcome measures were attendance for screening 6 months after randomisation and cost-effectiveness of the interventions. Results 1158 Women were individually randomised as follows: 289 control; 291 letter; 290 flag; 288 both interventions. Attendance was ascertained for 1148 (99%) of the 1158 women. Logistic regression adjusting for the other intervention and practice produced an odds ratio (OR) for attendance of 1.51 (95% confidence interval (95% CI 1.02 to 2.26; p=0.04) for the letter, and 1.39 (95% CI 0.93 to 2.07; p=0.10) for the flag. Health service costs/additional attendance were £35 (letter) and £65 (flag). Conclusions Among recent non-attenders, the letter was effective in increasing breast screening attendance. The flag was of equivocal effectiveness and was considerably less cost-effective than the letter.
机译:目的研究两种旨在增加近期未入院妇女的乳腺筛查摄取率的基于初级保健的干预措施的有效性和成本效益。在伦敦西北部和英国西米德兰兹郡进行第二轮乳房筛查(低于60%)时,设定了13种吸收率低的常规做法。参加这些活动的妇女是最近在第三轮未进行乳房筛查的女性。方法实用性析因随机对照试验,将人们随机分为系统的干预措施(普通医生的来信),机会主义的干预措施(妇女笔记中的标记提示卫生专业人员进行讨论),或两者都不干预。干预措施随机化后6个月,采取干预措施进行筛查,以评估干预措施的成本效益。结果:1158名妇女被随机分为以下两组:289名对照; 291字母; 290标志; 288两种干预措施。在1158名妇女中,有1148名(99%)出席了会议。对其他干预和实践进行逻辑回归调整后,出勤率(OR)为1.51(95%置信区间(95%CI为1.02至2.26; p = 0.04),而信度为1.39(95%CI为0.93至2.07) ; p = 0.10),结论:卫生服务费用/额外出勤率分别为£ 35(信)和£ 65(标志)。结论在最近的非就诊者中,这封信可以有效地增加乳房筛查的出勤率。效果,且成本效益远低于信函。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号