首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical screening >A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme
【24h】

A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme

机译:通过乳房癌筛查计划按读者数量对一幅和两幅乳房X光检查进行比较的癌症检出率比较:英国国家卫生局乳房筛查计划的结果

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective To determine the increased cancer detection rate, if any, of programmes in the UK National Health Service breast screening programme (NHSBSP) using more than single reading of mammograms. Design Information on the detection of cancers by individual screening programmes from annual (KC62) returns, supplemented by questionnaire information about the number of readers. Setting The 87 NHSBSP programmes from England and Wales for the screening year 1 April 1996 to 31 March 1997. The study includes all programmes for prevalent screens where two views are mandatory, but excludes the four programmes using two view mammography for incident screening. Main outcome measures Cancer detection, invasive cancer detection, and small (<15 mm) invasive cancer detection by mammographic reading protocol using single reading as the reference level. Results Programmes collectively using single reading detected the lowest rate of cancers at both prevalent (first) and incident (subsequent) screening. The highest rate of age standardised cancer detection was achieved by programmes using double reading with arbitration. At prevalent screens, where all programmes used two views, those programmes using double reading with arbitration detected 32% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3% to 69%) more small (<15 mm) invasive cancers than programmes using single reading. At incident screens, where all programmes analysed used one view this increased to 73% (95% CI 40% to 113%). Recall rates showed no obvious difference between single reading and the double reading protocols, being around 7% for prevalent screens and 3.5% for incident screens. Discussion The results suggest that the increase in cancer detection resulting from increasing the number of readers depends on the number of views, and is higher for one view than two views. Single reading of one view results in a low detection rate of small invasive cancers for most individual programmes. It is, however, recognised that a small number of individual readers may achieve high detection rates with such a protocol. All groups of programmes using different reader/view protocols are on average close to or above target cancer detection rates, except those using single reading of one view (mediolateral oblique) at incident screens.
机译:目的为了确定英国国家卫生局乳房筛查计划(NHSBSP)中使用多个乳腺X光检查的程序是否增加了癌症检出率。通过年度(KC62)申报表中的个别筛查程序检测癌症的设计信息,并附有有关读者人数的问卷信息。设置1996年4月1日至1997年3月31日来自英格兰和威尔士的87个NHSBSP程序。该研究包括所有必须使用两种视图的流行筛查程序,但不包括使用两种视图乳房X线照相术进行事件筛查的四个程序。主要结局指标通过使用单次读数作为参考水平的乳腺X线照片读取协议,进行癌症检测,浸润性癌检测和小(<15 mm)浸润性癌检测。结果集体使用单一读数的程序在流行筛查(首次)和事件筛查(随后)中都发现了最低的癌症发生率。通过使用具有仲裁功能的双读程序,可以达到最高的年龄标准化癌症检测率。在所有程序都使用两种视图的流行屏幕上,那些使用双读和仲裁的程序检测到的侵袭性癌症(小于15毫米)比程序多32%(95%置信区间(CI)3%至69%)。使用单读。在事件屏幕上,所有被分析的程序都使用一个视图,该比例增加到73%(95%CI 40%至113%)。召回率显示单读和双读协议之间没有明显差异,对于流行的屏幕,召回率约为7%,对于事件屏幕,召回率约为3.5%。讨论结果表明,由于读者数量的增加而导致的癌症检测的增加取决于视图的数量,并且对于一个视图而言,要高于两个视图。单读一个视图会导致大多数个体程序对小浸润性癌的检测率低。然而,已经认识到,少数个人阅读器可以通过这种协议实现高检测率。使用不同阅读器/视图协议的所有程序组平均接近或高于目标癌症检出率,但在事件屏幕上仅使用一个视图(中外侧斜)的单个程序除外。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号