...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences >The quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for early stage prostate cancer: a technical note
【24h】

The quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for early stage prostate cancer: a technical note

机译:早期前列腺癌的容积调制弧光治疗(VMAT)计划的质量保证:技术说明

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

AbstractAs radiation therapy transitions from intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) it is important to consider the quality assurance (QA) of VMAT plans in light of what has previously been learned and developed in IMRT QA. This technical note assesses if IMRT based plan QA software, which has reduced the need in IMRT for phantom dose measurements on the linear accelerator, can be incorporated into VMAT QA processes. Twenty prostate cases were retrospectively planned using VMAT with one arc to deliver a prescription of 74 Gy in 37 fractions. A plan QA was performed using both IMSure (version 3.3), a software-based IMRT QA program, and ArcCHECK (version 6.2.3.5713), a phantom-based VMAT QA tool. Outcomes assessed included the time needed to perform the QA of both the IMSure and ArcCHECK QA methods, and agreement between planned dose and QA measured dose. On average per case, the ArcCHECK technique needed 31.5 min to perform the VMAT plan QA, while IMSure required 3.5 min to perform the same QA. All 20 cases passed dosimetric QA using ArcCHECK. However, using IMSure, three cases failed dosimetric QA using the departments existing IMRT QA criteria. This research has demonstrated that the IMRT QA software IMSure may be incorporated into the QA of VMAT plans, however the criteria to assess the dosimetry of the VMAT plans may need to be different to that for IMRT cases. The implication of this research for radiation therapists is to be critically aware of the differences between the plan QA requirements and methods for IMRT and those required for VMAT.
机译:摘要随着放射治疗从强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)过渡到体积调制弧光治疗(VMAT),重要的是要根据IMRT QA先前了解和开发的内容考虑VMAT计划的质量保证(QA)。本技术说明评估是否可以将基于IMRT的Plan QA软件(已减少在IMRT中用于线性加速器上的幻象剂量测量的需求)整合到VMAT QA流程中。回顾性地使用VMAT回顾性计划了20例前列腺病例,以37个分数提供74 Gy的处方。使用基于软件的IMRT QA程序IMSure(3.3版)和基于幻像的VMAT QA工具ArcCHECK(6.2.3.5713版)都执行了计划QA。评估的结果包括执行IMSure和ArcCHECK QA方法的QA所需的时间,以及计划剂量和QA测量剂量之间的一致性。平均而言,ArcCHECK技术需要31.5分钟才能执行VMAT计划质量检查,而IMSure需要3.5分钟才能执行相同的质量检查。所有20例病例均使用ArcCHECK通过了剂量质量QA。但是,使用IMSure,有3个案例使用了部门现有的IMRT QA标准未能通过剂量学QA。这项研究表明,IMRT QA软件IMSure可以并入VMAT计划的质量保证中,但是评估VMAT计划剂量的标准可能与IMRT情况不同。这项研究对放射治疗师的意义在于,必须清楚地了解IMRT计划的QA要求和方法与VMAT所需的方法之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号