首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International >Efficacy of Kensil Fine, a Diatomaceous Earth, When Applied to Protect Maize Stored under Simulated and Real Farmer Situations in Kenya
【24h】

Efficacy of Kensil Fine, a Diatomaceous Earth, When Applied to Protect Maize Stored under Simulated and Real Farmer Situations in Kenya

机译:硅藻土Kensil Fine的功效,用于保护肯尼亚模拟和真实农民状况下储存的玉米

获取原文
       

摘要

Kensil fine, a local diatomaceous earth was evaluated under simulated and real farmer storage conditions. Three serial concentrations of: 0.3%, 0.5% and 0.7% w/w were applied on 8 kg of grain in mini sacks (simulation trial) or 90 kg grain (full bags) under farmer storage conditions. The Australian amorphous silica diatomaceous earth (Dryacide) Dryacide and a cocktail of 1.6% Pirimiphos methyl and 0.3% permethrin (Actellic super), the currently recommended storage chemical dust were included for comparison. All treatments including the control were replicated four times in the simulation trial. Two bags represented each treatment in the farmer situation. Changes in the quantities of dust and foreign matter (fm), grain moisture, pest population (live and dead) and percent grain damage were monitored through sampling. For 24 weeks, there were no statistical differences among treatments or between them and the control at both sites and the trials were extended by three months. After 36 weeks, significant differences were observed between the control and treatments for each of the four parameters. However, no significant differences in the quantity of fm sieved from treatments which reflected the DE doses applied. Grain moisture was slightly influenced by climate while applied treatments effectively suppressed pest establishment resulting into very low grain damage. Higher Kensil doses suppressed infestation, but it was the lowest dose that did not pose health challenge to the farmer and still gave effective grain protection.
机译:在模拟和真实的农民存储条件下,对Kensil细砂,当地硅藻土进行了评估。在农民的存储条件下,对8千克迷你麻袋谷物(模拟试验)或90千克谷物(满袋)中的三个系列浓度分别为0.3%,0.5%和0.7%w / w。比较了澳大利亚非晶硅硅藻土(Dryacide)Dryacide和1.6%的Pirimiphos甲基和0.3%的苄氯菊酯(Actellic super)的混合物(目前推荐的存储化学粉尘)进行比较。在模拟试验中,包括对照在内的所有处理均重复了四次。在农民的情况下,每种治疗用两个袋子代表。通过采样监测粉尘和异物(fm),谷物水分,有害生物种群(生死)和谷物损害百分率的变化。在24周内,两个地点的治疗之间或治疗与对照之间均无统计学差异,试验延长了三个月。 36周后,在四个参数的对照和治疗之间观察到显着差异。但是,从处理中筛选出的fm量没有显着差异,这反映了所施用的DE剂量。谷物的水分受到气候的轻微影响,而采用的处理方法则有效地抑制了有害生物的形成,从而使谷物的损失极低。较高的Kensil剂量可以抑制病虫害,但这是最低剂量,不会对农民造成健康挑战,仍然可以提供有效的谷物保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号