首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy >Analysis of Liquid Medication Dose Errors Made by Patients and Caregivers Using Alternative Measuring Devices
【24h】

Analysis of Liquid Medication Dose Errors Made by Patients and Caregivers Using Alternative Measuring Devices

机译:使用替代测量设备分析患者和护理人员造成的液体药物剂量错误

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Patients use several types of devices to measure liquid medication. Using a criterion ranging from a 10% to 40% variation from a target 5 mL for a teaspoon dose, previous studies have found that a considerable proportion of patients or caregivers make errors when dosing liquid medication with measuring devices. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and magnitude of liquid medication dose errors that occur with patient/caregiver use of various measuring devices in a community pharmacy. METHODS: Liquid medication measurements by patients or caregivers were observed in a convenience sample of community pharmacy patrons in Korea during a 2-week period in March 2011. Participants included all patients or caregivers (N?=?300) who came to the pharmacy to buy over-the-counter liquid medication or to have a liquid medication prescription filled during the study period. The participants were instructed by an investigator who was also a pharmacist to select their preferred measuring devices from 6 alternatives (etched-calibration dosing cup, printed-calibration dosing cup, dosing spoon, syringe, dispensing bottle, or spoon with a bottle adapter) and measure a 5 mL dose of Coben (chlorpheniramine maleate/phenylephrine HCl, Daewoo Pharm. Co., Ltd) syrup using the device of their choice. The investigator used an ISOLAB graduated cylinder (Germany, blue grad, 10 mL) to measure the amount of syrup dispensed by the study participants. Participant characteristics were recorded including gender, age, education level, and relationship to the person for whom the medication was intended. RESULTS: Of the 300 participants, 257 (85.7%) were female; 286 (95.3%) had at least a high school education; and 282 (94.0%) were caregivers (parent or grandparent) for the patient. The mean (SD) measured dose was 4.949 (0.378) mL for the 300 participants. In analysis of variance of the 6 measuring devices, the greatest difference from the 5 mL target was a mean 5.552 mL for 17 subjects who used the regular (etched) dosing cup and 4.660 mL for the dosing spoon (n?=?10; P? less than ?0.001). Doses were within 10% of the 5 mL target volume for 88.7% (n?=?266) of the participant samples. Only 34 cases (11.3%) had dose errors greater than 10%, and only 6 cases (2.0%) had a variance of more than 20% from the 5 mL target volume. Dose errors greater than 10% of the target volume were more common for the etched dosing cup (47.1%, n?=?8), the dosing spoon (50.0%, n?=?5), and the printed dosing cup (30.8%, n?=?4), but these 3 devices were used by only 13.3% of the study participants. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 10 participants measured doses of liquid medication with a volume error greater than 10%, and these dose errors were more common with the etched dosing cup, the dosing spoon, and the printed dosing cup. Pharmacists have an opportunity to counsel patients or caregivers regarding the appropriate use of measuring devices for liquid medication.
机译:背景:患者使用几种类型的设备来测量液体药物。以前的研究使用的标准是,与一茶匙剂量的目标5 mL偏差在10%到40%之间,从以前的研究中发现,相当多的患者或护理人员在使用测量设备进行液体药物给药时会出错。目的:确定社区药房中患者/护理人员使用各种测量设备时发生的液体药物剂量错误的发生率和严重程度。方法:在2011年3月的两周内,在韩国社区药房顾客的便利样本中观察了患者或护理人员的液体药物测量。参与者包括所有来药房的患者或护理人员(N?=?300)。在研究期间购买非处方药或处方药。参加者由既是药剂师又是药剂师的研究人员指示,从6种替代品(蚀刻校准剂量杯,印刷校准剂量杯,剂量勺,注射器,分配瓶或带有瓶口适配器的勺子)中选择首选的测量设备,并使用他们选择的设备测量5毫升剂量的Coben(马来酸氯苯那敏/盐酸去氧肾上腺素,大宇制药有限公司)糖浆。研究人员使用ISOLAB量筒(德国,蓝色刻度,10 mL)来测量研究参与者分配的糖浆量。记录参与者的特征,包括性别,年龄,受教育程度以及与药物治疗对象的关系。结果:在300名参与者中,有257名(85.7%)是女性;而在女性中,这一比例最高。 286(95.3%)至少具有高中文化; 282名患者(94.0%)为患者的护理人员(父母或祖父母)。 300名参与者的平均(SD)测量剂量为4.949(0.378)mL。在分析这6种测量装置的方差时,与5 mL目标值的最大差异是使用常规(蚀刻)剂量杯的17名受试者的平均5.552 mL和使用剂量勺的4.660 mL的平均值(n≥10; P ≤0.001)。对于参与样本的88.7%(n?=?266),剂量在5 mL目标体积的10%以内。只有34例(11.3%)的剂量误差大于10%,只有6例(2.0%)的5 mL目标体积差异大于20%。蚀刻剂量杯(47.1%,n?=?8),剂量勺(50.0%,n?=?5)和印刷剂量杯(30.8)的剂量误差大于目标体积的10%更为常见。 %,n?=?4),但只有13.3%的研究参与者使用了这3种设备。结论:大约十分之一的参与者测量的液体药物剂量的体积误差大于10%,并且这些剂量误差在蚀刻剂量杯,剂量勺和印刷剂量杯中更为常见。药剂师有机会就适当使用液体药物的测量设备向患者或护理人员提供咨询。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号