首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural Science >Physiological Response to Different Irradiation Regimes during Barley Seedlings Growth Followed by Drought Stress under Non-Photoinhibitory Light
【24h】

Physiological Response to Different Irradiation Regimes during Barley Seedlings Growth Followed by Drought Stress under Non-Photoinhibitory Light

机译:在非光抑制条件下大麦幼苗生长后干旱胁迫对不同辐射方式的生理响应

获取原文
           

摘要

Differences in physiological response of barley seedlings cultivated under low (LI, ~65 umol m-2 s-1) and elevated irradiation (EI, ~450 umol m-2 s-1) to upcoming drought were evaluated. After ten days of cultivation, drought stress was induced under LI by withholding water and was defined as: mild stress (MS), severe stress (SS), extreme stress (ES) and control (C, well watered). Decreased relative water content (RWC) in both LI and EI grown plants was associated with increased lipid peroxidation (TBARS) and electrolyte leakage (%EL) as well as with decreased total chlorophylls content at SS and ES. Antioxidative response to drought was, generally, indicated by higher accumulation of free proline, increased activities of catalase (CAT), guaiacol peroxidase (GPOD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX). Even the majority of estimated physiological and biochemical parameters showed no differences between investigated light regimes before drought stress induction, the LI grown plants responded on drought by adjustment of the photosynthetic apparatus to prevent photoinhibitory oxidative damage. Photosynthesis downregulation in EI grown plants under ES was revealed due to reduced values of maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) and performance index (PIABS) showing that acclimatization to EI conditions lowered their tolerance to the following drought stress although it was applied under low irradiation (LI). Therefore, those plants had reduced capability to cope with the challenge of upcoming drought stress showing more pronounced cellular oxidative damage (SS and ES), less efficient and almost dysfunctional photosynthetic apparatus in extreme drought (ES).
机译:评价了在低(LI,〜65 umol m-2 s-1)和高辐射(EI,〜450 umol m-2 s-1)下大麦幼苗对即将发生的干旱的生理响应差异。耕种十天后,禁水导致干旱胁迫下的干旱胁迫,其定义为:轻度胁迫(MS),重度胁迫(SS),极度胁迫(ES)和对照(C,浇水良好)。 LI和EI种植植物的相对水含量(RWC)降低与脂质过氧化(TBARS)和电解质泄漏(%EL)增加以及SS和ES的总叶绿素含量降低有关。通常,通过增加脯氨酸的游离脯氨酸,过氧化氢酶(CAT),愈创木酚过氧化物酶(GPOD)和抗坏血酸过氧化物酶(APX)的活性来表明对干旱的抗氧化反应。即使大多数估计的生理和生化参数在干旱胁迫诱导之前在所研究的光照方案之间也没有差异,LI种植的植物通过调节光合作用装置来防止干旱,从而防止光抑制氧化损伤。由于光系统II的最大量子产率(Fv / Fm)和性能指数(PIABS)降低,表明EI下EI种植的植物的光合作用下调,表明对EI条件的适应降低了其对随后干旱胁迫的耐受性在低辐射下(LI)。因此,那些植物应对即将到来的干旱胁迫的能力降低,在极端干旱(ES)中表现出更明显的细胞氧化损伤(SS和ES),光合装置效率低下并且几乎失灵。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号