首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Market Access & Health Policy >Drug reformulations and repositioning in the pharmaceutical industry and their impact on market access: regulatory implications
【24h】

Drug reformulations and repositioning in the pharmaceutical industry and their impact on market access: regulatory implications

机译:制药行业中的药物配方调整和重新定位及其对市场准入的影响:监管含义

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Repurposing has become a mainstream strategy in drug development, but it faces multiple challenges, amongst them the increasing and ever changing regulatory framework. This is the second study of a series of three-part publication project with the ultimate goal of understanding the market access rationale and conditions attributed to drug repurposing in the United States and in Europe. The aim of the current study to evaluate the regulatory path associated with each type of repurposing strategy according to the previously proposed nomenclature in the first article of this series.Methods: From the cases identified, a selection process retrieved a total of 141 case studies in all countries, harmonized for data availability and common approval in the United States and in Europe. Regulatory information for each original and repurposed drug product was extracted, and several related regulatory attributes were also extracted such as, designation change and filing before or after patent expiry, among others. Descriptive analyses were conducted to determine trends and to investigate potential associations between the different regulatory paths and attributes of interest, for reformulation and repositioning cases separately.Results: Within the studied European countries, most of the applications for reformulated products were filed through national applications. In contrast, for repositioned products, the centralized procedure was the most frequent regulatory pathway. Most of the repurposing cases were approved before patent expiry, and those cases have followed more complex regulatory pathways in the United States and in Europe. For new molecular entities filed in the United States, a similar number of cases were developed by serendipity and by a hypothesis-driven approach. However, for the new indication's regulatory pathway in the United States, most of the cases were developed through a hypothesis-driven approach.Conclusion: The regulations in the United States and in Europe for drug repositionings and reformulations allowed confirming that repositioning strategies were usually filed under a more complex regulatory process than reformulations. Also, it seems that parameters such as patent expiry and type of repositioning approach or reformulation affect the regulatory pathways chosen for each case.
机译:背景:调整用途已成为药物开发的主流策略,但它面临着多重挑战,其中包括不断增加和不断变化的监管框架。这是一个由三部分组成的系列出版物项目的第二项研究,其最终目的是了解美国和欧洲因毒品再利用而引起的市场准入理由和条件。本研究的目的是根据本系列第一篇文章中先前提议的术语来评估与每种再利用策略相关的监管路径。方法:从发现的案例中,选择过程总共检索了141个案例研究。所有国家/地区,在美国和欧洲统一了数据可用性和通用许可。提取了每种原始药品和改制药品的监管信息,还提取了一些相关的监管属性,例如专利到期之前或之后的名称变更和备案等。进行了描述性分析,以确定趋势并调查了不同监管途径和利益属性之间的潜在关联,分别用于重新制定和重新定位案例。结果:在所研究的欧洲国家中,大多数重新制定产品的申请都是通过国家申请提交的。相反,对于重新定位的产品,集中程序是最常见的监管途径。多数重新使用目的的案例在专利到期之前已得到批准,并且这些案例在美国和欧洲遵循了更为复杂的监管途径。对于在美国提交的新分子实体,偶然性和假设驱动的方法发展了类似的案例。但是,对于美国新适应症的监管途径,大多数情况是通过假设驱动的方法得出的。结论:美国和欧洲有关药物重新定位和重新制定的法规允许确认通常采用重新定位策略监管过程比重新制定更为复杂。同样,似乎参数(例如专利到期和重新定位方法或重新制定的类型)会影响为每种情况选择的监管途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号