首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Market Access & Health Policy >3. How comprehensive can we be in the economic assessment of vaccines?
【24h】

3. How comprehensive can we be in the economic assessment of vaccines?

机译:3.在疫苗的经济评估中,我们可以有多全面?

获取原文
       

摘要

In two previous papers we argued on current vaccines economic assessment not fully comprehensive when using the incremental cost-utility analysis normally applied for treatments. Many differences exist between vaccines and drug treatments making vaccines economic evaluation more cumbersome. Four challenges overwhelmingly present in vaccines assessment are less important for treatments: requirements for population, societal perspectives, budget impact evaluation, and time focused objectives (control or elimination). Based on this, economic analysis of vaccines may need to be presented to many different stakeholders with various evaluation preferences, in addition to the current stakeholders involved for drugs treatment assessment. Then, we may need a tool making the inventory of the different vaccines health economic assessment programmes more comprehensive. The cauliflower value toolbox has been developed with that aim, and its use is illustrated here with rotavirus vaccine. Given the broader pers...
机译:在先前的两篇论文中,我们争论了当使用通常用于治疗的增量成本效用分析时,当前疫苗的经济评估还不够全面。疫苗和药物治疗之间存在许多差异,使疫苗的经济评估更加麻烦。疫苗评估中普遍存在的四个挑战对于治疗而言并不重要:人口需求,社会观点,预算影响评估以及以时间为中心的目标(控制或消除)。基于此,除了当前参与药物治疗评估的利益相关者外,可能还需要向具有不同评估偏好的许多不同利益相关者介绍疫苗的经济分析。然后,我们可能需要一种工具,使不同疫苗健康经济评估计划的清单更加全面。为此,已经开发了花椰菜价值工具箱,并在此处举例说明了轮状病毒疫苗的使用。鉴于范围更广...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号