首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Protection >A Comparison of Relative Humidity between Two Swedish Buildings with Different Ventilation Solutions
【24h】

A Comparison of Relative Humidity between Two Swedish Buildings with Different Ventilation Solutions

机译:不同通风解决方案的两栋瑞典建筑之间的相对湿度比较

获取原文
           

摘要

This project is based on measurements of the parameter relative humidity, RH (%), in two buildings: one with natural ventilation and one with mechanical ventilation. Both buildings are located in central Sweden, which constitutes a representative climate zone with respect to Swedish conditions. An important factor for the indoor environment, which affects human health and well-being, is the level of the relative humidity, RH (%). Research studies show that the healthiest level should be in the range of 40% - 60%. Surveys have revealed that about 70% of the employees at Swedish offices, schools and kindergartens experience that the air is too dry during the winter season. Previous studies show that the level of relative humidity in the indoor environment influences the prevalence of respiratory infections and allergies. The purpose of this study is to investigate how the relative humidity differ between the two buildings, and if this may be a cause of the health problems that users are affected by. During many years, users have complained about the environment in the building with mechanical ventilation and that they suffer from health problems. The method used in the study is air measurements of the two parameters, relative humidity and air temperature in the two buildings using data loggers. The indoor environment is affected by the outdoor climate and therefore instruments are placed outdoors to record seasonal variations. The measurements were carried out during the period October 2014 to September 2015 to include all of Sweden’s four seasons with completely different climatic conditions. The results of this study show that the relative humidity in the mechanically ventilated building is consistently significantly lower than in the building with natural ventilation whatever the time of year and temperature indoors. This study shows that mechanical ventilation in buildings affects the indoor environment negatively with respect to human health during most time of the year and this fact must be taken into consideration for the existing as well as the planning of new ventilation systems.
机译:该项目基于对两栋建筑物中相对湿度RH(%)的参数测量:一栋采用自然通风,另一栋采用机械通风。这两座建筑均位于瑞典中部,就瑞典的条件而言,这是一个典型的气候区。影响室内环境的一个重要因素是相对湿度RH(%)。研究表明,最健康的水平应该在40%-60%的范围内。调查显示,瑞典办公室,学校和幼儿园中约70%的员工在冬季感到空气太干燥。先前的研究表明,室内环境中的相对湿度水平会影响呼吸道感染和过敏的发生率。这项研究的目的是调查两座建筑物之间的相对湿度如何不同,以及这是否可能是导致使用者受到健康问题影响的原因。多年来,用户一直抱怨机械通风的建筑环境以及健康问题。研究中使用的方法是使用数据记录仪对两个建筑物中的两个参数(相对湿度和空气温度)进行空气测量。室内环境受室外气候的影响,因此将仪器放置在室外以记录季节变化。这项测量是在2014年10月至2015年9月期间进行的,其中包括瑞典四个气候条件完全不同的季节。这项研究的结果表明,无论一年中的时间和室内温度如何,机械通风建筑物的相对湿度始终显着低于自然通风建筑物。这项研究表明,一年中的大部分时间,建筑物中的机械通风会对人体健康产生负面影响,因此,现有的通风系统以及新通风系统的规划都必须考虑到这一事实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号