首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization >The Urgency of Legal Protection towards the Debtor of the Prospective Company in Bankruptcy Process in Commercial Court
【24h】

The Urgency of Legal Protection towards the Debtor of the Prospective Company in Bankruptcy Process in Commercial Court

机译:商事法院破产程序中对准公司债务人进行法律保护的紧迫性

获取原文
       

摘要

Article 2 paragraph (1) juncto Article 8 paragraph (4) The Law Number 37 Year 2004 about Bankruptcy and Postponement of Loan Payment Obligation states that the debtor must be bankrupted if he/she is proven to have the creditor more than one and does not settle at least a loan on time and receivable. This provision makes unfairness towards the debtor of the prospective company, because in the settlement process in the court the prospective aspect of the debtor to repay the loan is not made as the basic by the judge to make decision. The decision of bankruptcy statement towards the company will gives effect not only on the debtor but also on another side related to the existence of the company. Technically since it is judged as bankrupt, the company must stop the whole business process. It means that the business relation with colleague, consumer, or even with the employee will also automatically stop. The company will loose the right of authorization of all wealth because it has been submitted to the curator to do general confiscation. Based on this, the problem that will be investigated is that what is the urgency of the protection towards the debtor of the prospective company in the bankruptcy. The method that is used in this study is normative study by using primary and secondary law material through conceptual and costitutional approaches by doing analysis in analytical prescriptive. There are 3 principles of the importance of giving protection towards the debtor of prospective company in the bankruptcy which are 1). The principle of public welfare protection 2). The principle of prospective business protection 3). The principle of national economic emowerment.
机译:第2条第(1)款第8条第(4)款关于破产和延期偿还债务的第37号2004年法律规定,如果债务人被证明拥有多于一个债权人且没有债权人,则必须破产。至少按时偿还应收款项。该规定对准公司的债务人不公平,因为在法院的和解程序中,偿还贷款的债务人的预期方面不是法官作出决定的基础。对公司的破产声明的决定不仅会影响债务人,还会影响与公司的存在有关的另一面。从技术上讲,由于被判定为破产,该公司必须停止整个业务流程。这意味着与同事,消费者甚至与员工的业务关系也将自动停止。该公司将放弃所有财产的授权权,因为它已提交给策展人进行一般没收。基于此,将要研究的问题是在破产中对潜在公司的债务人提供保护的紧迫性是什么。本研究中使用的方法是规范性研究,通过在概念性和合宪性方法中使用主要和次要法律材料,并在分析性规定中进行分析。对破产中的准公司的债务人提供保护的重要性有3个原则,即1)。公益保护原则2)。准企业保护原则3)。国民经济发展原则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号